34

Often, in antiquity, rulers would order some horrific things to happen like extreme torture, flaying and so forth. The Hongwu Emperor ordered 5000 women flayed alive for instance.

Obviously the rulers themselves didn't carry out these things so ordinary people had to and I would assume that it would have a very serious effect on their mental state.

Are there any written accounts from people who carried out these kinds of things detailing how it affected them? I'm not talking about basic execution or war, but acts of extreme sadism.

  • 27
    @PieterGeerkens Is that relevant? True that the psycho-analysis might not exist but people still wrote about how they felt. – Steve Oct 6 at 17:50
  • 7
    It would be useful to distinguish between mass murder, war, collective punishment, and usual judicial procedures (torture was the norm, not the exception until a few centuries ago). The psychological consequences could be different between the murderer of innocent villagers and the judicial torturer of a hideous criminal. Remember that the criminal's victims did not have modern medicine, they would agonize and die slowly due to infection after fractures or cuts that today would be seen as minor issues. After watching that, if they let the bastard die quickly, would it appear just? – Luiz Oct 6 at 20:07
  • 5
    If torture is a normal practice in your culture (and it was for most pre-modern cultures and even some modern ones then you are not apt to question its affect on you at all. – Gort the Robot Oct 6 at 23:11
  • 7
    @PieterGeerkens : I think you are making a confusion between psycho-analysis and psychiatry, which is much older than Freud : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_psychiatry – Evargalo Oct 7 at 10:16
  • 4
    amazon.com/Auschwitz-Doctors-Eyewitness-Miklos-Nyiszli/dp/… - from a doctor forced to participate in atrocities. – NKCampbell Oct 7 at 17:20
28

Takashi Nagase wrote a book about his experiences during and after the Second World War entitled Crosses and Tigers, and financed a Buddhist temple on the Thai-Burma railway to atone for his actions during the war. This included his time as a Kempeitai (military secret police) interpreter and torturer in a prison camp on the railway. He later befriended Eric Lomax, one of his former victims.

The story is told in The Railway Man, Lomax's autobiography and the subsequent film.

| improve this answer | |
20

Since it has not been mentioned yet: There are quite a lot of accounts of the Holocaust from the point of view of its perpetrators. It does indeed seem as if there were some psychological problems (often in the form of alcohol abuse), but many perpetrators also seem to have found some way to justify what they were doing (orders have to be followed, it is ugly but necessary because they might kill us otherwise etc).

Another data point might be https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Act_of_Killing , which is a documentary about atrocities in Indonesia in the 1960s. But I have not seen that movie yet.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Upvoted for the Act of Killing. This absolutely nails what the OP is looking for. First-hand accounts from torturers of what they did, with the documentarian focussing on the psychological consequences for them years later. Pretty hard to watch despite consisting only of interviews and absurd re-enactments, because of how closely the subject matter and psychological consequences are studied. My understanding of how people come to do such things (while still being people) derives from this film – benxyzzy Oct 9 at 5:36
17

Some examples can be found in the log book of Vasco da Gama first travel to India:

"Vasco da Gama ordered to torture two captured Arabs. With cool blood the Captain-Commander interrogated the unhappy prisoners, dropping on their backs the boiling mixture of tar and oil..."

From the travel log of Alfonso de Albuquerque:

"In Mascat (Muscat), Albuquerque ordered to exterminate almost all population, and to those who remained to cut their noses and ears."

It is not known who exactly wrote the log of the expedition, but one can be sure that the texts were approved by the Captain-Commanders, since these were their official reports.

Many similar examples can be found in the 15-16 centuries travel logs. (I cite not from the original travel logs, but from the book by Jules Verne, "Découverte de la Terre: Histoire générale des grands voyages et des grands voyageurs" (Discovery of Earth), who cites the original logs.)

Another rich source is the Malleus Maleficarum (Hammer of witches) which is a manual to inquisitors published in 1486. It is essentially an inquisitor's manual, and it contains a lot of "case studies", taken from the original logs of interrogations by inquisition. (Until 18 century, torture was a normal, approved juducial procedure in many countries).

Of course the comment that inquisitors did not torture themselves is correct. But they were present and gave orders. Those executioners who actually performed torture were probably illiterate and did not put their impressions in writing.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    Inquisitors didn't do the tortures themselves, though they were present - I don't know if this counts for the OP. The other cases are valid. – Pavel Oct 7 at 6:24
  • 3
    Your link about Malleus Maleficarum doesn't really support your paragraph about it, IMHO; that page contends that the Malleus doesn't accurately reflect the practices of the Inquisition. – ruakh Oct 8 at 5:54
  • @ruakh: you are right. I actually read the book, but I do not have any link to a text of English translation. I read a Russian translation myself, but normally I do not include Russian links on this cite. – Alex Oct 8 at 13:21
14

Pictures from the book "Drawings from the GULAG" by Danzig Baldaev, a retired Soviet prison guard. Depictions of the Soviet genocide.

In Melgunov's Red Terror in Russia 1917 - 1923 are several accounts of executioners and torturers going insane. He tells of a Bolshevik commissar named Mikhail Kedrov who was famous for making it a point to execute the children himself. He went insane.

| improve this answer | |
  • Is that book you're linking to Public Domain or copyrighted? – nick012000 Oct 9 at 5:24
13

In the documentary, "All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace" by Adam Curtis (produced by the BBC), episode 3, there is footage from an interview in 1967 with a mercenary who tortured and murdered people in the Congo (approximately at the 30 minute mark). The same clip is included in this blog post by Adam Curtis which includes a lot of historical background for the documentary.

Joseph Desire Mobutu had seized complete control of the Congo and he moved against the rebels. This time though the white mercenaries switched sides and worked for the rebels. But they had lost Major Hoare, their old leader, and they rapidly spun out of control. The mercenaries committed horrific acts of violence against Congolese rebels and civilians. To the Congolese it was as though the ghosts of the horrors they had suffered under the Belgian King Leopold had been reawakened.

This is part of an interview with one of those mercenaries. He is remarkably open about both what he did and what he felt as he did it. You don't see anything, but what he describes is really not for the squeamish.

I do not know if the full footage of the interview is available publicly.

| improve this answer | |
4

Dr. Miklos Nyiszli's Auschwitz: A Doctor's Eyewitness Account (ISBN 583122345)

The author talks of his participation as a means of survival and is not the easiest of reads.

| improve this answer | |
4

The diary of Thomas Thistlewood, an 18th century slaveowner in Jamaica, records in great and vivid detail his regular torture, rape, and forced humiliation of 'his' slaves. The diary has been digitised by Yale University and is available at the website of the Beinecke library.

| improve this answer | |
  • Not sure why you put the quotation marks around "his". The slaves legally belonged to him, so describing them as "his" is accurate. Also, from that page you linked to, I'm uncertain if you can classify it all as rape and torture. It sounds like he was just punishing slaves who refused his orders, and some of the sexual activities with female slaves might have been consensual. – nick012000 Oct 9 at 5:33
  • 2
    nick no, there is no way that sexual activities between a slaveowner and a slave can be consensual, that is not how consent works. – Guy F-W Oct 9 at 10:15
1

Henri Sanson, executioner of France, was part of the Sanson family who were the hereditary executioners for around 150 years. He wrote a book in 1847 describing his experiences and the experiences of his ancestors as related by family stories passed down over the years. (https://www.amazon.com/Memoirs-Sansons-Private-Documents-1688-1847-ebook/dp/B07DYBRSF7/ref=sr_1_4?dchild=1&keywords=henri+sanson&qid=1602259992&sr=8-4)

I know that there are also other books covering Charles-Henri Sanson, who was executioner during the period of the French Revolution, that describe his experiences, but all the books I've been able to find appear to be in French.

Anyways, the Sansons typically carried out state-mandated tortures and executions, but were never enthusiastic about it. The book I linked to above apparently describes their experiences and when they were particularly disgusted about the work they had to do. Executioners in France didn't have many job prospects, being semi-outcasts, so that was pretty much the only job available to them. Several Sansons took up practicing medicine as a side job (back when no formal education was needed) because they were unhappy with their primary job and the things they did.

I personally have not read the book I listed above, but I have heard selections from it on the History According to Bob podcast, which has been covering the French executioners over the past year.

| improve this answer | |
1

Note sure if it counts, but Eric Fair is an Arabic linguist who worked in Iraq as a contract interrogator in early 2004.  He wrote a book on his experience, available from his web site.

He discussed this in a Washington Post article, quoted on this blog (and elsewhere):

A man with no face stares at me from the corner of a room.  He pleads for help, but I’m afraid to move.  He begins to cry.  It is a pitiful sound, and it sickens me.  He screams, but as I awaken, I realize the screams are mine.

That dream, along with a host of other nightmares, has plagued me since my return from Iraq in the summer of 2004.  Though the man in this particular nightmare has no face, I know who he is.  I assisted in his interrogation at a detention facility in Fallujah.

There's too much to quote, and some of it's quite distressing.  He goes on to say:

I failed to disobey a meritless order, I failed to protect a prisoner in my custody, and I failed to uphold the standards of human decency.  Instead, I intimidated, degraded, and humiliated a man who could not defend himself.  I compromised my values.  I will never forgive myself.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.