Zygmunt Zieliński in his study called "The myth of a Catholic Pole" in the book Polish political myths of the 19th and 20th centuries observes:

(…) the criterion for distin­guishing the nationality was not Polishness but Catholicism. This was to emphasize certain historical interrelations: to be a Pole meant to be a Catholic. The limes on whose eastern side were the orthodox Ruthenian tribes and on the western the Catholics under the Polish rule is seen as considerably responsible for the rise of the myth. (…) The stereotype of a Catholic Pole was strengthened when the neighbouring empires intervened for the sake of the dissidents living within the Polish borders. Even the Polish Enlightenment (…) was not able to undermine the conviction that Polishness and Catholicism were inseparable. The post-partition period encouraged to manipulate with the now politically informed concept of a Catholic Pole. It was variously used, often for opposite purposes, different for the occupants but heterogeneous also among the politically divided Poles. The stereotype of a Catholic Pole was growing independently in each section of the partitioned Poland depending on the attitude of the oppressor to the dominant faith (…) The stereotype was transposed after World War II, in the communist period. Catholic values were recognized as the main power capable of helping the nation to preserve its identity. Instead of an emotionally conceived Catholicism, there appeared the need of a definite worldview, whose chosen reference to the Polish historical tradition pointed to Catholicism as the proper option (…) the stereo­type of a Catholic Pole after World War II was reduced to a series of symbols providing a simplified but efficient weapon against the communist ideology by setting it against the originally Polish and Catholic. (…) The myth of a Catholic Pole belongs to the imponderables, but becomes an element of reality disregarding its historical truth as well as present day reality (…)

Given that Catholicism has been helping the nation to distinguish itself from its neighbours since the Christianization of Poland, are there any other countries where Catholicism played a similar role?

Background of my question:

According to rainbow-europe Poland has the lowest percentage of achieved LGBTI human rights. Countries like Malta, Lithuania, Portugal, Croatia, Ireland have similar percentage of Roman Catholics (according to "Discrimination in the EU in 2015", Special Eurobarometer) and they have much or slightly higher percentage of achieved LGBTI human rights (89%, 23%, 66%, 46% and 52% accordingly), so it probably means that the instance of Poland is different; hence, I ask the question about the history of Catholicism in other countries.

  • 4
    Welcoe to History.SE, apex39. Are you basically asking if it was unusual for Catholicism to be a part of a national identity? That is not particularly uncommon as religion was extremely important in much of Europe historically. Modern conditions for LGBT rights is a result of a multitude of factors, and specific details of historical religiosity isn't as relevant as general socioeconomic developments - see for instance how the former Eastern bloc in general scored considerably lower than the west.
    – Semaphore
    Oct 14, 2020 at 10:03
  • Thank you for your comment. Yes, that's what I am asking. I can hear many people pointing to Catholicism as a cause of it; thus, I am trying to narrow down the factors and check if there's something specific in Polish historical religiosity.
    – user47306
    Oct 14, 2020 at 11:55
  • Thank you for mentioning socioeconomic developments – I am eager to check how/if they directly affect LGBT rights.
    – user47306
    Oct 14, 2020 at 12:04
  • 1
    I genuinely don't understand what you find so exceptional about the history of Polish Catholicism in the first place. That their religious faith is part of their national identity ? That they've endured persecution on account of it ? Or that, throughout their troubled history, it provided its adherents with some sens of comfort and/or unity ?
    – Lucian
    Oct 14, 2020 at 15:29
  • 2
    Personally I can't support re-open without some evidence that the question has addressed the causes of closure. Several comments indicate confusion about the thesis of the question (which I share), and the question shows no research or definitions to address those issues.
    – MCW
    Jun 19, 2021 at 11:24