1

Since when did it become popular to shorthand years from 2020 A.D. to 2020? I haven't seen anything after a google search, and in fact I wonder if it was even popular to use A.D., ever. I don't recall a time I ever used it.

  • @Tsundoku You seem to be right, I'll post it over there, thank you. – Carlos Medina Oct 25 at 19:07
  • 1
    Please don't repost it. We can migrate it. – Tsundoku Oct 25 at 19:08
  • 1
    You have things around the wrong way, it's AD 2020, not 2020 AD. AD is Latin for Anno Domini & it always preceded the year. When spoken, or written in long form, in English, it was In the Year of the Lord .... Hence AD 2020. Times before Christ or before the common era, as is courrently preferred, are so many years before ... Hence those dates are written with the BC or BCE after the year, thus 250 BC or 250 BCE. – Fred Oct 26 at 3:34
  • @Fred Never knew this, thanks!. – Carlos Medina Oct 26 at 18:38
3

Here’s a quick survey of selected chronicles and histories of England from the 14th to 19th centuries, with quotes illustrating how the writers refer to years.

You’ll see that the only writer I found who uses “A.D.” in running text is John Milton. This is a very small sample, but if it’s representative, then I think the most likely answer to your question is that there was never a period in which many writers in English used “A.D.”!

The survey suggests instead that the following trends or developments took place.

  1. Writers fluent in Latin described years however they pleased, for example in the survey above we have Brompton’s “anno Gratiae” and Rudburn’s “Anno ab Incarnatione Domini”. But in other authors you might find “anno saluto Christianæ …” (in the …th year of Christian salvation) or “anno Christi nati supra …” (in the …th year after the birth of Christ) or other phrases with equivalent meaning. This variety declined along with the use of Latin, leaving only the conventional “Anno Domini”.

  2. The year number was originally understood as an ordinal numeral. This is clearest in Higden where “Gratiae MCXXXVII” is parallel to “Stephani primo” (first of Stephen), not to “Stephani uno” (one of Stephen). However, when these Latin phrases were translated into English, the number became a cardinal numeral. For example Holinshed writes “in the year of our Lord 1555” and not “in the 1555th year of our Lord”. This change allowed the number to become a kind of name for the year.

  3. Writers in English increasingly shortened or omitted calendrical prefixes over the 16th and 17th centuries, so that by the mid-17th century it was conventional to write years as plain numbers, leaving writers like Milton who used “A.D.” in a small minority.

| improve this answer | |
  • If you are interested in ancient history you will see AD and BC used frequently. Roman history, for example, is both sides of the year dot, so it is necessary to be unambiguous. – RedSonja Oct 26 at 11:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.