In a large medieval city fed by the agricultural product of the area, plus imports such as grains, spices, fish, etc. and also serving as a regional hub for the exchange of trade goods, what determined the placement and number of market locations in the city? How big was a market was needed relative to city population in terms of vendors and space?
-
2Welcome to History:Stack Exchange. Thank you for your question; please consider revising it to be more in line with our community expectations. Like many other stacks, we expect questions to provide evidence of prior research. That helps us to understand the question, and avoids our repeating work you've already done. Our help center, and other stacks provide additional resources to assist with revisions.– MCW ♦Feb 3, 2021 at 2:29
-
2I’m voting to close this question because it lacks prior research, is too broad and unclear. Which region, period etc needs to be detailed, and prerequisites like privileges examined, before a useful answer can be attempted.– LаngLаngСFeb 3, 2021 at 10:50
-
You might look at central place theory; I believe the theory has been discredited, but the arguments to support/refute it may be of use in refining your question.– MCW ♦Feb 3, 2021 at 11:49
2 Answers
You can get some information concerning the number of markets relative to population by looking at the Wikipedia page on Market Towns. One specific tidbit there might be of use to you (emphasis mine).
The primary purpose of a market town is the provision of goods and services to the surrounding locality.1 Although market towns were known in antiquity, their number increased rapidly from the 12th century. Market towns across Europe flourished with an improved economy, a more urbanised society and the widespread introduction of a cash-based economy.2 The Domesday Book of 1086 lists 50 markets in England. Some 2,000 new markets were established between 1200 and 1349.3 The burgeoning of market towns occurred across Europe around the same time.
This gives us some specific information on a specific time and location, 50 markets in England at the time of the Doomsday Book. We can get some numbers on the population at the time of the doomsday book :
The total population of England in 1086 cannot be calculated accurately from Domesday for several reasons: only the heads of households are listed; major cities like London and Winchester were omitted completely; there are no records of nuns, monks, or people in castles. The population of England at the time of Domesday has been tentatively estimated at between 1¼ and 2 million. However, these figures are much lower than the 4 million people there are estimated to have been in Roman times.
So if we do the math, we can get those 50 markets divided into the population across England in 1086 showing each market covered a population of 25,000 to 30,000 people. This is oversimplification just to get a numerical 'ball park' figure, but interestingly it seems to match the figures provided in another answer by @Pieter Geerkens, which showed 5 markets in a city of 125,000 for one market covering 25,000 people.
You can look at the first quote and see that the distribution of markets changes quite a bit a little later in the middle ages (12th to 14th centuries):
their number increased rapidly from the 12th century. Market towns across Europe flourished with an improved economy, a more urbanised society and the widespread introduction of a cash-based economy...Some 2,000 new markets were established between 1200 and 1349.
Running numbers on England again, but picking just at the maximum population estimates before the depopulation event of the plague, we find a population estimate of 6,000,000 having access to some 2000 markets, giving us one market per each 3000 residents. A major difference showing that variation in time and conditions, all still within the medieval period.
It's a bit late in the period, but this 1572 map of Antwerp, with a population that year of about 125,000 lists at least 5 markets in the legend:
-
- Die Ossemarct. - The Ox Market.
Just inside the East Wall, between the two main gates
- Die Ossemarct. - The Ox Market.
-
- Die Ve[e]marct. - The Cattle Market
Three blocks north of 13.
- Die Ve[e]marct. - The Cattle Market
Note that horsemeat is popular in much of France and the Low Countries; and both "Cattle market" and "Horse Market" may both be referring to two styles of butchery rather than to livestock. To my mind, livestock markets are more likely to be locate outside the city walls than inside - the former locations per force catering primarily to the households of the city.
This slightly later map of Amsterdam dates to 1593. It lacks the definitive legend, but there a couple of likely market locations visible upon inspection.
Many thanks to LangLangC for translation and spotting assistance.
-
-
1Aiming for Dutch/Flemish, which do form a continuum with (esp low) German: antwerpen.be/info/5b0fb767a67793f7a36609a6/… nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veemarkt_(handel) Feb 3, 2021 at 16:52
-
1Last detail: place names most often have historic origin, so that all those markets were really where the live beasts were traded (as well as the meat (compare the reasoning for 18: meat house/butcher's guild hall rebuilding). And in those towns/cities live animals on sale were as much a common sight in the centre back then (certainly in medieval times) as it is now still in Wuhan… ;) 'Mainly just horses in the streets' is 'a bit' later than the map. Feb 3, 2021 at 17:07
-
1@LаngLаngС: Got it; that makes much sense on reflection. Great find with that Bredael painting of the Ox market! Feb 3, 2021 at 17:13
-
1The tendency is of course to push away the filthiest trades to the margins or even outside an ever growing city. There are a few books on that town available for free example, showing that just below the grote marct the vemarct once was, but got replaced for an 'egg market' (street still existing today "Eiermarkt") (not depicted, as a few others, so consequently, the map only depicts the biggest selling centres?) Feb 3, 2021 at 18:01