I'd like to know when the first time the name of India in English (Inde in French) was called. What is the name in Latin and if there is one?

Also, I'd like to know the first time the names of Myanmar (or Burma) and Senegal were called. I think these two countries might not have names in Latin.

  • 1
    If you have a copy of the Oxford English Dictionary available, perhaps online from your local library, it will give you the history (etymology) of these words. – Schwern Apr 30 at 17:40
  • Why does it get downvote? – hermes May 1 at 17:41


The classical Latin was "India" taken from the Sanskrit "Sindhu" and Persian "Hindu" possibly referring to any large river which formed a natural border. The Greeks picked it up from the Persians as Indós (Ἰνδός) and Herodotus talks about India, some of it is actually true.

Eastward of India lies a tract which is entirely sand. Indeed, of all the inhabitants of Asia, concerning whom anything is known, the Indians dwell nearest to the east and the rising of the Sun.

Take Herdotus with a heavy pinch of άλας.

The Romans borrowed from the Greeks as Indus, India, and Indian. Old English borrows it from the Latin as "India" or "Indea".

The area referred to as "India" began with the Persians and Greeks referring to the area around the Indus River. Then everything east of the Indus River. To the Romans and Europeans it could refer to just about anything in South Asia west of China, or even the horn of Africa. Thus we get the "East Indies", the misnamed "West Indies", the "East India Company", and "Indonesia" (an 18th century melding of Ἰνδός (Indus) and νῆσος (Island)).

The country we call "India" is a product of geography and British colonialism. Prior to the British the region was made up of many nations and empires. In some periods nearly all of modern India was under the control of a single empire such as the Maurya around 300 BC, to the Mughal Empire established in the early 1500s until its decline in the 18th century. The Mughal Empire and the British East India Company were both dissolved and the Government of India Act 1858 established the British Raj in 1858. This was partitioned in 1947 into the Dominion of India and the Dominion of Pakistan. The Dominion of India became the modern Republic of India.

Myanmar / Burma

This is already well covered on Wikipedia by Names of Myanmar. Here's a tl;dr.

Burma comes from the Bamar or Burmese people (ဗမာ [Bamar] + လူမျိုး [race]). It's thought that colloquial Burmese shifted the B to an M with many different variations through Burmese history. မြန်မာပြည် or Mranma kingdom, spoken with a soft R, is "Myanmarpyi".

The change from Burma to Myanmar reflects attempts to shed their colonial legacy. "Burma" likely comes from the Indian "Barma" possibly a mixing of "Bama" and "Brahma-desh". The Portuguese turned this into Birmânia (turning "Birmans" into "the country of the Birmans" Latin-style like "Germania") which came into English as however 18th century map makers thought it should be spelled: Bermah, Birmah, Brama, Burmah, Burma, Burmah. The Times finally standardized on Burma.


Like India, Senegal refers to the region around the Senegal River named so by the Portuguese for... something, it's not clear. There's a number of hypotheses including the Zenaga language of the region or a misunderstanding of "Sunuu Gaal" meaning "our boat".

Explorer: "What's that?" (points at river)
Local: "Our boat." (thinks they're pointing at their boat)
Explorer: Ahh, the Ourboat River.

It's probably a folktale, similar to the idea that "Canada" is Cartier misunderstanding the local word for "the town" despite Cartier's own writing correctly translating the word.

  • thanks for this answer. Do you know when "Myanmarpyi" and "Senegal" were used the first time? Could they be in use since the 15th century? – hermes Apr 30 at 21:14
  • @hermes The Portuguese reached Senegal in the mid-1400s, so it's conceivable they were using the word then. I can't say for sure, I don't have the sources. Myanmarpyi (or rather မြန်မာပြည်) is native Burmese dating from at least the 13th century, probably much further back, but Europeans wouldn't know that in the 15th century; they got the name via India sometime in the 16th and 17th centuries. – Schwern Apr 30 at 21:32
  • "Indi" (or "Indie") must be available in the 15 century because Columbus named islands in the Caribbean "West Indies" for his belief that he had reached India. – hermes Apr 30 at 22:46
  • The Mughal Empire was "picked apart" by the Maratha for more than a half century before Clive, already a pale shadow of itself by 1757. Prior to Clive's campaigns during the Seven Years War European traders contented themselves with working with existing Indian political structures. – Pieter Geerkens Apr 30 at 22:50
  • 1
    @PieterGeerkens Yes, my mistake. – Schwern Apr 30 at 23:37

India is named after the Indus river. The name of the river is probably quite ancient. It was used for an area close to the Indus river ("Hidus") by the Persians under Darius I and then by Herodot and subsequently by other Greek and Latin authors.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.