2

The Federalist Papers were written by Madison, Jay and Hamilton to support the then proposed constitution of the USA starting in October 1787 in response to articles critical of the constitution. A total of 85 essays were eventually published in a nine month span.

Q. Did any of these 85 papers mention the Native Americans?

I checked the synopses of the papers on Wikipedia but there appeared to be no mention at all. They do mention the enslaved population of kidnapped Africans in one brief paragraph.

They do of course mention many European peoples and nations, both contemporary and ancient.

5
  • 2
    Please document your preliminary research The Federalist Papers are online and searchable. This should be an easy question to answer. They are mentioned in Federalist #3, 24 and 42 at the least.
    – MCW
    May 11 at 12:19
  • @MCW: I've documented my research above. I might have missed something, or the synopses might have missed something. But I think it unlikely. May 11 at 12:20
  • @MCW: Still, it is important to check. We can all make mistakes - can't we? May 11 at 12:22
  • 3
    @MCW - Well ... I'd say this is one of those situations where it helps to already know a lot about the founders, so you know how to search. It helps to know they used "Indian" to get those 3 hits you found. You'd likely have to be acquainted with the Declaration of Independence to have thought to search on the slur "savage", which got me one more hit (in #21).
    – T.E.D.
    May 11 at 13:11
  • @MCW: And also Federalist 25. See my answer. May 11 at 15:44

1 Answer 1

3

Mark Savage actually addresses this question in his article, Native Americans and The Constitution published by the American Indian Law Review in 1991. He writes towards the end of this essay that:

Publius discussed Native Americans in four essays. The third essay argued that war powers should be national. A national power would tend to prevent wars with Native Americans which individual states provoked or invited.

Essay 24 argued that standing armies in a time of peace were necessary for protecting the Western Frontier from attacks by Native Americans. Alexander Hamilton added that garrisons on the frontier "will be keys to trade with the Indian nations" and that a standing army was necessary to protect the garrisons from seizure by the British or Spanish.

Essay 25 discussing why this power should be invested in the national government rather than the states, argued that: The territories of Britain, Spain, and the Indian Nations in our neighbourhood, do not border on particular states. But encircle the Union from MAINE to GEORGIA. The danger, though in different degrees, is therefore common. And the means of guarding against it ought in like manner to be the objects of common council and of a common treasury.

Essay 42 discussed two classes of powers vested in the national government, a class of powers "which provide for the harmony and proper intercourse among the States." The power to regulate commerce with foreign nations fell among the former class. The power to regulate commerce among the states and with the Native Americans fell among the latter and was more particularly a species of "restraint imposed on the authority of states."

He also adds:

Insofar as The Federalist is competent evidence of the original understanding, these four essays do not elucidate the meaning of the text [ie the Constitution] but they help to illuminate the intent of the Framers.

In general, Savage argues that the Constitution formally gave the federal government very circumscribed powers over the Native Americans, mostly to do with trade rather than any substantative political or juridicial jurisdiction.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.