1

Of course, a lot has been said about the lack of female genitalia in e.g. Bouguereau's The Birth of Venus and so many other examples, but are there any examples from art between the end of the Middle Ages to the beginning of the 20th century of depictions of the nude female body that include the vulva?

Obviously excluding things where the actual subject of the painting is the vulva, L'Origine du monde, being the most famous example. I'm asking specifically about depictions of the nude female form where the focus isn't the pubic region.

3

1 Answer 1

4

German-french TV channel Arte TV made a short film (German, French) about the practice of Anasyrma, of lifting your skirt to publicly present your naked genitalia.

In the film, which starts with Gustave Courbet's painting The origin of the world, there are two more Flemish paintings from the 16th century:

Both paintings depict a scene from a story reported by Plutarch in his Moralia, where Persian women show their vulvae to fleeing Persian soldiers to scare them back onto the battlefield.

At the time when Cyrus induced the Persians to revolt from king Astyages and the Medes he was defeated in battle. As the Persians were fleeing to the city, with the enemy not far from forcing their way in along with the Persians, the women ran out to meet them before the city, and, lifting up their garments, said, "Whither are you rushing so fast, you biggest cowards in the whole world? Surely you cannot, in your flight, slink in here whence you came forth." The Persians, mortified at the sight and the words, chiding themselves for cowards, rallied and, engaging the enemy afresh, put them to rout.

Both paintings make the genitalia a central part of the painting, but depict a considerably larger scene. While the reproduction of Francken's painting is not large enough to say for sure, the one of van Veen clearly details the vulvae.

Looking through depictions of van Veens work, there is also his Amazones and Skythians with the same level of detail.

2
  • 1
    "Scare them back"? I could think of other motivations… ;) But in any case, this word choice is as I read it here imo quite, let's say 'odd' (if not very questionable for quite some reasons?). So can you please quote that part from your source? (As far as i understand that WP: 'they 'lured' them back to battle by promising to refuse 'further entry' for known cowards', or sth?) Sep 29, 2022 at 16:22
  • 1
    @LаngLаngС I was more influenced by the videos (around 2:10), that say the soldiers were "shocked - and turned back". But after looking at the source, I stand by my interpretation.
    – ccprog
    Sep 29, 2022 at 16:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.