Why did the UK, Australia, and New Zealand abolish Brigadier General, and replace it with a Brigadier? But why did solely Canada preserve Brigadier General?
Why did Canada retain the rank of Brigadier General? But not Australia, New Zealand, or UK?
3The answer to "Why did the UK, Australia, and New Zealand abolish Brigadier General..." is in the linked Wikipedia article. The organisation of these three armies was such that the rank of a 'brigadier' was equivalent to a 'senior colonel' (the highest field officer rank), 'whereas brigadier-general was the lowest general officer "rank"'.– Steve BirdJan 29 at 9:25
@SteveBird How does that work, time-wise, please? I hadn't noticed that Canada still had Brigadier Generals and if I had, I'd still be asking how senior colonel and junior general mattered - particularly since clearly, it wasn't the same in all three armies? I share Azor Ahai -him's doubt about the large pictures and ask how even one could help… the more so since I don't understand how crossed swords represent either historical Brigadier General or modern Brigadier outside Canada.– Robbie GoodwinJan 30 at 23:57
1Further, Britain didn't 'abolish' the rank of Brigadier General but switched to promoting officers to Brigadier, while keeping Brigadier General in deference to extant holders… which in itself makes the 'senior colonel/junior general' idea harder to follow. Quite separately, I agree with Azor Ahai about the proliferation of pictures - particularly since two show the same guy! Again, my Wiki - and other WWW - thinks a Canadian Navy Commodore or Army or Air Force Brigadier General wears the sword-and-scabbard not alone as shown, but between a crown and a maple leaf.– Robbie GoodwinJan 31 at 0:13
The US military has Brigadier Generals. Is this relevant?– user35395Feb 6 at 9:38
TL;DR: The Canadians did not retain that rank, but re-created it in 1968.
The difference between use of "Brigadier" and "Brigadier-General" in armies seems to depend on the way they feel that senior command should be organised. A "Brigadier" is a senior variety of colonel, while a "Brigadier-General" is the most junior kind of general.
The British Army had Brigadier-Generals until 1922, when they decided to rename the rank "Colonel-Commandant" making it clearly a senior colonel. The title was not well-liked, and was changed to Brigadier in 1928. The armies of the Dominions of the British Empire followed suit, including Canada.
The modern Canadian Brigadier-Generals appeared in 1968, when the Canadian Army, Navy and Air Force were merged into the Canadian Forces. At this point, a lot of traditional practices were discarded and new systems were created, mostly designed by politicians rather than service commanders.
Since then, the Canadian Forces have often seemed a bit strange to other Commonwealth countries. For years, for example, the Navy and Air Force used Army-style ranks, even though members of the Forces could not be considered interchangeable between air, land and sea units. Many of the details of the unification have been reversed over the years, including re-introducing the naval rank system, and separate uniforms and service names for the air and sea components, although the unified command arrangements have persisted. Brigadier-Generals have been retained, possibly for similarity to American ranks.
google.com/books/edition/… has an entry for Arthur Henry Oliver LLoyd . He seems to be the same person as genealogieonline.nl/en/genealogie-richard-remme/I355703.php , which lists his dates as 1864-1944. He seems not to have been Canadian. Jan 30 at 12:23
The Canadian Crabs may have stripy cuffs for their officers, but they still call their Squadron Leaders 'Major'. Jan 31 at 15:35
@MichaelHarvey: Thanks, corrected. Feb 1 at 6:34