On the 10th of June 1940, Benito Mussolini announced his war declaration to the Italian people, and he said (video, at 6:10):

Noi impugnamo le armi per risolvere, dopo il problema risolto delle nostre frontiere continentali, il problema delle nostre frontiere marittime; noi vogliamo spezzare le catene di ordine territoriale che ci soffocano nel nostro mare, poichè un popolo di quarantacinque milioni di anime non è veramente libero se non ha libero accesso all’oceano.

Which in English would be:

We are taking up arms to resolve the problems on our continental borders. The problems on our maritime borders. We want to break the territorial and military chains that confine us in our sea. Because a country of 45,000,000 souls is not truly free if it does not have free access to the ocean.

A translation of the speech in English is available here.

  1. Italy is in the middle of the Mediterranean sea. How does it not have access to the ocean?

  2. How would winning the war give Italy free access to the ocean?

  3. Why, according to his theory, are people not free if they don't have access to the ocean? Are Swiss people non-free according to Mussolini's theory?

  • 2
    1. and 2. depend heavily upon whether you're nit-picking the difference between an ocean and a sea.
    – Steve Bird
    Commented May 14, 2023 at 17:31
  • teche.rai.it/2020/06/10-giugno-1940-litalia-entra-in-guerra seems to say the same thing Commented May 14, 2023 at 20:22
  • 1
    It's not possible to freely trade by water with anywhere except about the sea. Access to the ocean allows trade with the world.
    – Mary
    Commented May 15, 2023 at 0:50
  • 3
    I am not going to do the research necessary to turn this into an answer, but I am reasonably certain what Mussolini was talking about was Italy's free access to global trade. At the time, the Mediterranean was enclosed by the Strait of Gibraltar to the West, and the Suez Canal to the East, both of which were under de facto control of the U.K. I believe this was a thinly veiled threat to England. I am sure if you focus research on these two tactical and commercial chokepoints, you will get your answer. Commented May 15, 2023 at 1:52

2 Answers 2


In 1932, Mussolini expressed his embrace of an Italian Empire when he (with Giovanni Gentile) wrote the entry for the Italian Encyclopedia defining fascism, wherein he states

...For Fascism, the growth of empire, that is to say the expansion of the nation, is an essential manifestation of vitality, and its opposite a sign of decadence. Peoples which are rising, or rising again after a period of decadence, are always imperialist; and renunciation is a sign of decay and of death. [emphasis mine]

Mussolini saw Italy as degraded from the the golden era of the Roman Empire, and strove to regain that glory. In 1935, Italy invaded Ethiopia, and Mussolini announced to a cheering crowd, "the Roman Empire [is] back."

To rebuild the Roman Empire, Mussolini needed access to the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. In The March to the Oceans, a document written in 1939, he stated

The bars of this prison are Corsica, Tunisia, Malta, and Cyprus. The guards of this prison are Gibraltar and Suez. ...Once the bars are broken, Italian policy can only have one motto — to march to the oceans.

So, in winning the war and defeating England (which controlled Gibralter and the Suez), Italy would be able to expand outside of the Mediterranean.

Sorry if this is obvious and simplistic; I'm not a historian, or even a history buff, except for ancient history.


The more important portion of this passage isn't the ocean, but is the phrase from earlier in the speech, "soffocano nel nostro mare". Literally Our Sea. This was the focus of the passage, the claim to the right or necessity to control the Mediterranean Sea. This was a link to a nationalist rhetoric which had been promoted within Italy since the late 19th century. Think of it as an Italian cultural belief akin to Manifest Destiny, but with the focus on the Mediterranean and its surrounding region.

You can find much of this detailed in the Wikipedia article on the Mare Nostrum. The section on Italian nationalist usage of the phrase has the following (emphasis mine):

In the decades following the 1861 unification of Italy, Italian nationalists who saw Italy as the successor state to the Roman Empire attempted to revive the term. In particular, the rise of Italian nationalism during the "Scramble for Africa" of the 1880s led to calls for the establishment of an Italian colonial empire, which introduced for the first time a renewed and modern concept of Mare Nostrum:3

Even if the coast of Tripoli were a desert, even if it would not support one peasant or one Italian business firm, we still need to take it to avoid being suffocated in Mare Nostrum.

— Emilio Lupi

Note this was not a late (WW2 era) concept, but occurred in the late 19th century as a validation for part of the colonial efforts during the above-mentioned 'Scramble for Africa'. The quote from Lupi (from 1885), shows the primary consideration is security for the state, not trade or colonization (emphasis mine):

even if it would not support one peasant or one Italian business firm

The next section of the wiki article goes into Mussolini's repetition of the concept, over 50 years later:

The term was again taken up by Benito Mussolini for use in fascist propaganda, in a similar manner to Adolf Hitler's Lebensraum. Mussolini wanted to re-establish the greatness of the Roman Empire and believed that Italy was the most powerful of the Mediterranean countries after World War I. He declared that "the twentieth century will be a century of Italian power" and created one of the most powerful navies of the world in order to control the Mediterranean Sea.

The book Italian Foreign Policy, 1870-1940, discusses the appeal of the Mare Nostrum concept, in that it reaches across political boundaries:

Of all external problems, that which found the most general consensus was the demand for Italian security in the Mediterranean. As Zaghi writes,

Opponents and supporters of a colonial policy were in agreement that the essential interests of Italy, her future even, lay in this sea. Even those who would never approve an undertaking in the Red Sea...and who affirmed a policy of conquest abroad was a contradiction of the principles of Risorgimento, were prepared to back armed intervention that guaranteed the vital interest of the countries in the Mediterranean.

This attitude cut across all party divisions, from Sonnino to Branca, 'the only question that had the unconditional support of Right and Left'

So the passage in question, and especially the use of the phrase 'soffocano nel nostro mare' is an attempt by Mussolini to appeal to an old nationalist sentiment which had historically a broad appeal across the Italian population in an attempt to unite the people behind his declaration of war on France and England, the other large navies in the Mediterranean at the time.

(Comments by @Carlos Martin point out another examination of this concept as the term spazio vitale , and its connection as mentioned above to the Nazi concept of Lebensraum)

  • 2
    It also might be related to the Ethiopian conquest by Italy in the 30s (and the blocking of the Suez Canal and the Strait of Gibraltar by the UK) and the general access to the Eastern coast of Africa through the theory of the "vital space" (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spazio_vitale) Commented May 15, 2023 at 4:36
  • What I've always read was that he wanted to recreate the Roman Empire (or geographically, more like the late Republic), in particular making the Mediterranean "an Italian lake". Sadly for him, the Italian military wasn't quite up to a task of that scale, but at the start of the war they did control about a third of the North African coast, a fair bit of Illyria opposite Italy (Albania), and the Mediterranean sea's 2 largest islands. So it wasn't a bad start. France and England were certainly the right opponents to get themselves much of the rest.
    – T.E.D.
    Commented May 16, 2023 at 13:45
  • I think (don't know) that mare nostrum in the context of this speech has any particular significance besides "ownership", as Mussolini is addressing access to the Atlantic and Indian Oceans. That's why denial of access is an attempt to suffocate (stronger than confine) the Italians. Commented May 16, 2023 at 15:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.