The wiki entry on Mahmud Barzanji is very poorly written and very far from neutral. I turned to the Russian entry which is at least well-written and contains many interesting facts - some of them perhaps too interesting to be true, I am afraid. As there are no sources cited at all in the Russian entry it's hard to tell truth from fiction.

One striking fact mentioned there is that when Barzanji proclaimed himself King for the second time in 1922 he was supposedly recognized by the British and even received a congratulatory telegram sent in the name of the British Monarch.

This seems very suspicious to me, both on logical grounds and because there is no hint of anything like this in an academic paper which details the stormy relations between Barzanji and the British during 1922-1924.

So, what is the truth of the matter? Did the British really recognize Barzanji as King?

UPDT: Just bumping this...


As you say, it sounds very unlikely.

Mahmud had previously proclaimed independence in May 1919 after earlier accepting a British protectorate. He was captured by the British and exiled a month later. He was recalled in September 1922 to help stabilize unrest in the area, and proclaimed independence in November with himself as King. In December, the British and Iraqi government issued a joint proclamation recognizing "the rights of the Kurds living within the boundaries of Iraq to set up a Kurdish Government within these boundaries". Mahmud did not respond to this and organized attacks on the British with Turkish support. He was driven out of Sulaimaniya in March 1923 and finally surrendered in the summer 1927.

This chronology leaves just one month between Mahmud's declaration and the British/Iraqi declaration. Given that the British policy under Percy Cox to incorporate south Kurdistan into Iraq predates this, it is difficult to see how any official recognition would have been given. Officially, Mahmud's administration was only suspended in February 1923, which may have been interpreted/misrepresented by some sources as recognition. However, given that the recognition claim does not seem to be mentioned in any non pro-Kurdish edited source that I could find, I would guess that it is a political fabrication.

Some sources: The Middle East in the Twentieth Century by Martin Sicker and A Quest in the Middle East: Gertrude Bell and the Making of Modern Iraq by Liora Lukitz.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.