In the "Reports and Accounts, 1910-1911" by the Central China Famine Relief Fund (1912) there is a chapter on "Honan" and another on "Anhui" two of the provinces affected by flood referred to by the OP. The flood seems to be the major focus of the entire report. The report on Honan reads as follows in part:
Right Rev. Wm. C. White, Anglican Bishop in Honan, wrote from Kaifeng,
under date of May 2, 1911, as follows: I have just returned from the
famine region in the east of the Province... Many a tragic tale had
these people to tell of parties dwindled by starvation to one half and
even one third the original number. Most of them were still living on
roots and bark, the blades of new wheat, and 'kaoliang' straw, and the
mortality must be even greater than in the winter, for we occasionally
saw bodies in the fields usually being eaten by dogs, and heard
gruesome tales of survivors eating the dead bodies of their
comrades... A great deal of seed grain is being taken east, but all
under armed escort, and we daily heard stories of grain being
looted...But Kweiteh is practically only on the fringe of the famine
district, the famine centre in Monan being the districts of Yungcheng
and Siayi. The Chinese say that one-fifth of the population of
Yungcheng have succumbed to the famine. If this is so, and if the
census of this district taken last January is approximately correct,
it means that the appalling number of over 200,000 have died of
starvation.
Throughout the report there are similar eyewitness testimonies to the effects of the flood and the resulting starvation. The estimates of the death toll tend to be specific to various cities or regions (such as the one above) and in the report on Anhui the author writes:
It is impossible to make even an estimate of the number who have lost
their lives in this famine. No one, so far as I know, has the data
available for such an estimate. Nothing but a careful census, covering
large sections of the country, can show how many have perished of
famine and of the resulting famine fevers. The death rate has
undoubtedly been a large one, notwithstanding the relief that has been
given. It would undoubtedly have been very greatly increased had not
so much help been sent in. There is not a village without a
considerable list of the dead. Many have left home to try and exist by
begging in more fortunate centres who have perished by the roadside or
have been lost to sight. Families have been scattered, wives and
children sold in large numbers, and many have been reduced to a
condition of permanent beggary.