Toward the end of World War II, Germany had to utilize non-German soldiers, some of them from occupied countries like Poland and the Ukraine. At places like Omaha Beach, Normandy, individual Poles spontaneously defected, particularly when spoken to by Polish-Americans.

On the eastern front, the Germans managed to "turn" a whole division or more of captured Soviet soldiers under General Vlasov into fighting for the Germans against the Soviet Union.

Were there cases of the Allies seeking and receiving the defection of groups of soldiers recruited by the Germans (or Japanese)?

I'm excluding Italians (except when in German, not Italian uniform), since Italy itself was successfully "turned" by the Allies. Ditto for Vichy French soldiers in North Africa (unless in German uniform).

  • 2
    I gave +1, but a solid answer regarding Polish soldiers is on the way, as I can't agree with "individual", "spontanously" and especially with "Polish-Americans", whatever it means. – Darek Wędrychowski Mar 11 '13 at 22:18
  • I made a correction. It was on Omaha Beach that individual Poles in German uniforms surrendered to Polish Americans. Polish soldiers fought for the Allies ELSEWHERE in Normandy (e.g. Caen). – Tom Au Apr 29 '13 at 22:56
  • I wonder if the uprising of the Georgian Legion on Texel in 1945 qualifies? There is good evidence that the the Dutch resistance participated and assisted in the uprising, and that was (presumably) with the knowledge & approval of the Allies. Eric Lee has written a book about the uprising, titled Night of the Bayonets, & recently spoke about it on the History Hit podcast. – sempaiscuba Feb 6 '20 at 14:16
  • Since you mention Vlasov, you might also want to look into the role of his Russian Liberation Army during the Prague Uprising in May 1945. – Jan Feb 15 '20 at 22:27

I've promised to write an answer regarding Poles from Wehrmacht who joined Allies. So here it is.

Polish soldiers in Wehrmacht

First, how did Polish people land in Wehrmacht? There were three kinds of them. First of all, there was German minority living in Poland before the war (Polish citizenship). Second, Polish minority living in Germany (Polish nationality). Those groups had small or no choice to avoid army service, also many of them could actually believe and support Hitler.

But the third group was the biggest. Poles of both Polish citizenship and nationality, who singed Volksliste - the special document stating that they are Germans (if they lived in particular regions of Poland that had strong historical connections with Germany). Some of them made it because they found it an opportunity for themselves, others were simply forced to do that (many of those who didn't sign it, landed in concentration camps or had other problems).

Dates and numbers

From the overall number of 225000-375000 Wehrmacht soldiers, depending on how you define being a Pole, 90000 joined Polish Armed Forces in the West between 1943 and 1945. That's why I don't agree with the use of word "individual" in your question.

But I'll agree that from every German unit only individuals decided to do that. Why? The reason for that is because Germans perfectly knew they can't trust Poles. They didn't organize military units that based on Polish soldiers, but instead pushed few of them to each unit. So in fact, there were only Polish individuals in every German unit. Also any kinds of indiscipline, tries of desertion or acts of sabotage were punished with death. Still, some of them decided to do that.

I won't talk here about the history of Polish soldiers fighting together with Allies, as it's a different matter. Let's just say that the cooperation started in France in 1939, followed by 35000 soldiers coming to Great Britain, making up the largest non-British contribution in Battle of Britain.

Together, Polish Army Forces in the West counted around 220000 people (without counting the 30000 in reserve). There were also Home Army (biggest resistance movement in WW2) and Polish Army Forces in the East, but it's another topic.

So the mentioned 90000 soldiers from Wehrmacht made 40% of the overall number. Where and when they were recruited?

Before the Normandy, during North-African campaign, 2000 Poles from Wehrmacht were recruited. In the Middle East (1943) and Italy (1944), additional 2500.

As for the time between Normandy and the end of 1944, the number is 29000 (half by half for western and southern front).

1945 brings 55000 Polish soldiers from Wehrmacht joining Polish Army Forces in the West. Unfortunately, because of the ending stage of war, it's difficult to say how many of them actually took part in any fights.

It's important to add that there would be much more of them before 1944, because of the situation at Eastern Front, but Stalin didn't agree to release Poles from Wehrmacht kept in his prisoners-of-war camps. Later, many of them joined Polish Army Forces in the East.

Normandy as an example of recruitment practises

So what was the way of recruitment? Thankfully we have a good overview of that. As you've already mentioned Normandy, let's take it as an example. On the way, I'll explain why I don't agree with the use of "spontaneusly" and "Polish-Americans".

Polish forces, already having experiences from the Mediterranean front, perfectly knew what to do and that there will be great amount of Polish people who want to join Allies. Long before, the advertising campaign started, organized by the Polish government in exile, using a.o. flyers and radio messages. This way for many Poles from Wehrmacht who decided to join Allies, this decision wasn't spontaneus at all. They already knew before the battle, what they're going to do.

Here's the text of this message, written by the Minister of Defence, gen. Marian Kukiel, but translated by me from Polish language original, so all the language awkwardness is mine:

POLES IN GERMAN ARMY! The violent force pushed you among the ranks of deadly enemies of Poland, who abuses our Nation like a torturer. The violent force made you to wear German uniform. They order you to fight with armies of free nations (...). Together with Americans, Britons, Canadians and Frenches, there are also Polish Army Forces fighting. Many of you already got the guidelines, what Poland expects from you. The Government of Poland orders you: Don't shoot to your brothers - allied soldiers. If you have to shoot - miss the target. On the first opportunity go on Allies side or hide yourself, until they come for you. Serve Allies with all informations, when you meet them. When you're among the Allies, report that you're Polish, ask not to be kept with German prisoners and instead ask for contact with Polish Army officials. Your brothers, fighting together with Allies for liberation, want that from you. Long live Poland!

The (...) is there because I failed to translate a short part. The "violent force" is literal translation of "przemoc", which is a clear reference to words of Polish national anthem, which translated to English are: What the enemy's force has seized, we'll take back by the sword.

Recruitment in camps

So now imagine you're a Pole in the prisoner-of-war camp, right after Normandy. Of course the morale is at the lowest level which means completely no discipline. All Germans are angry with you, blaming Poles for not fighting. Allies realized what was happening, so in some camps, they arranged separate places for people of different nationality. But until it happened, they didn't want to interfere. So you could only stick together as a group of Poles, for better protection, until somebody came and took you out.

In this situation Polish officials had to act quickly. So Polish officers were coming from place to place and talked with soldiers about Polish Army Forces, offering joining them and fighting for liberation.

Now as for "Polish-Americans", mentioned by you. Of course there were around 2000 Polish-Americans who came fighting from United States and joined Polish Army Forces in 1944/1945. There also surely were some of Polish-Americans with American Army. But I don't think any of them had higher rank or any reputation, especially that American soldiers lacked experience and it was just the beginning of their campaign in Europe. And on the other side there were Polish Army Forces full of officers, already with big successes, fighting from the beginning of the war, on all fronts (they came from Russia through Middle East to Italy), who could easily turn Wehrmacht soldiers to fight for Allies. In this situation, who would care for Polish-Americans?

Of course I don't suppose you thought about Polish-Americans trying to convince Poles to join Allied forces in the middle of battle, with bullets swinging above the heads. :)


Those soldiers who agreed, landed in special camps in Scotland (Hamilton, Johnstone, Findo Gask), England (Grimsby) and France (Cherbourg, also Polish sector of St. Raphael camp). There were also camps in Italy (Taranto, San Basilio), but served for other Polish soldiers, not from Normandy and western campaign. Those camps were only for Poles and guarded only by soldiers from Polish Army Forces, as it was part of the agreement.

Group after group, they were later sent to Polkemmet in Scotland (speaking of the western camps), for closer look. Polish officials were checking their health, abilities and most importantly, if they were really willing to fight for Poland. For example they were checking the soldier's rank in Wehrmacht. The lower it was, the better for the soldier (as any Pole with higher rank could be in fact on the Hitler's side). Also they were checking if particular soldier had anything to do with SS, which was hated by all Poles from obvious reasons.

There was a case of a Polish soldier from Waffen-SS, who succeeded to hide it and claimed that he served in Wehrmacht. Nobody found out about it until the end of the world, while the soldier received a high reputation among his new combat friends for killing Germans.

Consequences for soldiers

Now another interesting thing. What was important for the soldiers was the fact that from that time, being officially deserters from Wehrmacht, they were no longer under protection of Geneva Conventions. So in order to protect themselves and their families, every soldier had a new pseudonym. Of course there was small probability that a such soldier becomes recognized by Germans as previous Wehrmacht member, but there were such stories, the first one noticed in June of 1940. That led to the situation where many of them, who died in fights, were buried under false names around cemeteries of Europe.

Back to the front

The overall level of such soldiers was different. Of course all of them had already their military training and experience, so they didn't need another one and could be sent directly to the front. Many of them had even some good habits from Wehrmacht, f.e. regarding discipline and neatness. As pretty much everywhere, they were of different abilities. Some of them were excellent soldiers, while some others rather poor ones. Among the best ones there were soldiers from famous Fallschirm-Panzer Division 1 "Hermann Göring". Also mechanics from Luftwaffe had great abilities because of special trainings.

Of course at the beginning it was difficult for Polish regular soldiers to trust those who served in Wehrmacht. But later, especially when more of them came and in many units there were more than half of ex Wehrmacht soldiers, people stopped thinking about it.

In overall, Wehrmacht soldiers made a good addition to Allied forces. It's was nicely described by one of Polish veterans, who said that "it was Wehrmacht itself who conquered Bologna for the II Corp" (Bologna was the last act of Italian campaign in April of 1945).

That's all from me, as it's 3am here in Poland. I live the rest of nations for others.

  • 1
    +1 from me also. I used "individual" in the context of "Normandy," a single battle field. And of course, a large number of Polish soldiers left Poland and joined the British First Army that fought at Caen. But my question was about Polish soldiers originally in GERMAN uniform. – Tom Au Mar 12 '13 at 12:15
  • I tried to focus only on Wehrmacht (from Western Front, which I know better), but somehow failed with that paragraph. :) – Darek Wędrychowski Mar 12 '13 at 12:19
  • "There was a case of a Polish soldier from Waffen-SS, who succeeded to hide it and claimed that he served in Wehrmacht. Nobody found out about it until the end of the world, while the soldier received a high reputation among his new combat friends for killing Germans." Did you perhaps mean to say "the end of the war"? I don't seem to recall the world having ended yet... – Vikki - formerly Sean Oct 11 '19 at 23:09

It appears that this happened with two units of the 30th Waffen Genadier Division of the SS. This division was recruited in Warsaw and was mostly peopled with various stripes of Slavs who happened to be anti-communist.

This worked OK on the Eastern front. However, when transferred to eastern France to fight the Free French, two battalions shot their German commanders and defected with all their equipment to the Free French side.

  • The real purpose of the question came from this post on another site. seekingalpha.com/instablog/399221-tom-au/… That is, if Britain had gone over to the Nazis, enabling the invasion of the U.S., even after the depletion of "Germans," could we have "turned" the non-German soldiers? Apparently that might have been the case. Thanks for your (upvoted) contribution. – Tom Au Mar 12 '13 at 22:42

Another example that might meet your criteria was the uprising of the Georgian Legion on Texel in 1945.

The Georgian Legion (German Georgische Legion) consisted of Georgian émigrés and prisoners of war. Many had been given the choice of joining the Legion or sharing the fate of many other Soviet POWs in Nazi captivity (in effect, "join up or die"). When deployed on the eastern front, many simply defected and rejoined the Red Army.

Hitler also distrusted Osttruppen (Eastern troops), particularly Georgians, and was quoted saying:

"... they are, according to what we hear, quite unreliable to all sides. However, I can imagine that because Stalin himself is a Georgian, quite a lot of people are attracted to the Communists. They had a kind of autonomy. The real Turkish people are Muslims. The Georgians are not a Turkish people, rather a typical Caucasian tribe, probably even with some Nordic blood in them. Despite all explanations — either from Rosenberg or from the military side — I don’t trust the Armenians, either. I consider the Armenian units to be just as unreliable and dangerous. The only ones I consider to be reliable are the pure Muslims, which means the real Turkish nations. Whether or not they are all militarily useful is a different question, which I can’t assess."

As a result, battalions of the Georgian Legion were transferred to the west, including the Netherlands, as occupation forces, rather than being used on the front-line on the eastern front.

On the night of 5/6 April 1945, the Georgian forces on Texel rose up against the Germans on the island before they could be transferred to the mainland to oppose the allied advance. Some 400 German soldiers were killed in the initial uprising, many killed while they slept or on guard duty in quarters they shared with the Georgians. There is good evidence that the the Dutch resistance participated in and assisted with the uprising. If the resistance had advance notice of the uprising, then they (presumably) also acted with the advance knowledge & approval of the Allies.

The Georgians and their Dutch allies failed to capture the naval batteries on the north and south of the island. The Wehrmacht sent reinforcements, and the ensuing brutal counterattacks and fighting on the island continued even after Germany ordered a general surrender on 8 May 1945.

We know (from intercepted communications) that Hitler demanded that an example should made of Georgian mutineers on Texel Island (UK National Archive reference HW 1/3690). In the event, fighting continued until Canadian units arrived on the island on 20 May to disarm the remaining German troops.

Eric Lee has written a book about the uprising, titled Night of the Bayonets to be published in August, & recently (29 January 2020) spoke about it on Dan Snow's History Hit podcast.

In addition, the UK National Archives have a file created by the Foreign Office (reference FO 371/47319) titled "Rising of Georgians (described as Soviet prisoners of war) against the Germans on Texel" which may provide further details of the events leading up to, and during, the uprising. Unfortunately, the file has not yet been digitised so it would need to be viewed in person.


The Soviets founded the Nationalkomitee Freies Deutschland in order to try to convince German troops to lay down their arms and desert. Their members were mainly recruited from POWs (such as Friedrich Paulus and Walter von Seydlitz-Kurzbach), but in some cases the time between becoming POW and becoming a supporter of the NKFD was so short that one might wonder what came first (e.g. Vincenz Müller during Operation Bagration). Towards the end of the war there were rumours within the German military that they would face "Seydlitz troops" fighting and sabotaging for the Soviets, but these were just rumours.


There were also some rather large-scale desertions from the highly infamous (for war crimes) Dirlewanger brigade after they had begun to recruit political prisoners, although arguably these were people that did not need to be "turned".

Vom 12. bis 14. Dezember 1944 wechselte so in Ungarn fast das gesamte 3. Bataillon des 2. Regimentes die Front. Unter ihnen waren auch aus dem KZ Sachsenhausen und Dachau rekrutierte politische Häftlinge.[24] Von 770 politischen Häftlingen gelang etwa 500 der Übertritt, etwa 200 wurden exekutiert. Ein weiterer kollektiver Frontwechsel fand im Februar 1945 statt – zu den Überläufern gehörte das spätere SED-Politbüromitglied Alfred Neumann.

Between December 12th and 14th, 1944, almost the whole 3rd battailon of the 2nd regiment switched sides. Among them were political prisoners that had been recruited from the concentration camps Dachau and Sachsenhausen. Of about 770 political prisoners, about 500 managed to switch sides, about 200 were executed. Another collective desertion happened in February 1945 - among the deserters was the future member of the SED politburo, Alfred Neumann. (from German wikipedia)


A German unit that regularly lost troops to desertions to the enemy was the 999th Penal Division. Some of its troops joined Greek and Yugoslav partisan groups. This article makes it appear as if the number of Germans among the Greek partisans was at least around 100, and this article estimates their number was around 400-500. Prominent members of the 999th Penal Division were e.g. Falk Harnack (deserted to the Greek partisans in 1944), Wolfgang Abendroth (ditto), Kurt Lohberger (ditto), Franz Ehrlich (became POW in Yugoslavia in 1945), or Karl-Eduard von Schnitzler (joined the French Resistance in summer 1944).

  • Is there any solid evidence that this happened before he was captured by the Red Army? – Moishe Kohan Feb 10 '20 at 21:42
  • The claim that Müller went over to the Soviets (and in less desparate circumstances than Friedrich Paulus) seems to reasonably well-established. As a general he would probably have been well aware of what the Soviets promised soldiers that switched sides. There is a biography of Müller by P.J.Lapp that probably goes into more detail. – Jan Feb 11 '20 at 20:25
  • Maybe, but you should provide a reference for that: None of your links suffice. Incidentally, as a general rule, all claims made by Soviet propaganda, should be taken with a huge bucket of salt. – Moishe Kohan Feb 11 '20 at 20:33
  • I believe the existence of the NKFD anf the role of figures like Paulus and Müller are rather uncontroversial. – Jan Feb 11 '20 at 21:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.