I often hear stories about enemies defeating elephant riders by axing the legs of the elephants.

Does this mean that the commander of the elephant army did not put enough armor on the elephants' legs?

3 Answers 3


An elephant is a very large animal. Putting the whole animal in armor would cost more in armor than the whole unit would be worth in warfare. (The same armor could be used to protect a large number of men.)

Therefore armor was used, if at all, to protect only the most vital parts of the animal, e.g., the temples. Most of the animal was unprotected. Of course, having men try to cut off their legs subjected the MEN to great risks.

Elephants proved not to be terribly effective in combat because they weren't as easy to control as horses, and would often "rebound" against the attackers. At the battle of Zama, for instance, Hannibal relied on elephants to break through the Roman lines, without success.

  • not even the front and the face of the elephant?
    – user4951
    Commented Nov 22, 2011 at 10:19
  • 3
    @JimThio: Up to you. Decide for yourself whether you want to put armor on the face of an elephant or use the same amount of armor for several of your men. Most commanders would choose the men. And if you choose the elephant, I wouldn't want to fight in your army.
    – Tom Au
    Commented Nov 22, 2011 at 18:30
  • @TomAu sources for lack of elephant armor? Elephants were already expensive so armoring them wasn't that big of a deal and the other answers provide examples of elephant armor. it is noted that Alexander defeated Porus elephants by poking at their legs youtube.com/watch?v=9vwMQUQUQlY You mentioned rebounding, other than fire (and possibly pigs???) the reason an elephant would rebound was (not necessarily fatal) injury imo this needs to have sources (at the very least an estimate of cost of an elephant vs basic armor ) before being accepted
    – Hao S
    Commented Apr 4, 2019 at 20:05

Google search for elephant armor

Google search for war elephants

Elephants were mostly used in war in South Asia. Use of elephants in the Mediterranean and Europe was much rarer and more amateurish.

It was written that when King of Kings of Iran Ardashir I, founder of the Sassanid Empire, fought the Romans he had 700 armored elephants. South Asian war elephant used in battle (instead of for transportation) before cannons became very dangerous were often highly armored. They also often had sword like blades attached to their tusks and swung large swords or chains with their trunks.

  • 5
    While you link to simple image search results, you don't provide any supporting references to show how typical these styles of armor were. The problem with many museum specimens is that they were often elaborate showpieces that were either never intended for the battlefield at all or were only used by an elite few and, consequently, are not representative of what was actually commonly used in battle.
    – Steve Bird
    Commented May 24, 2016 at 6:28

Acutally sometimes they were quite armoured. Yes you can pay upto 10-15 men's worth of armour with the same expenses but elephants were extremely costly and required enormous amounts of effort to train and maintain. They were often large targets and were susceptible to spearmen and arches, so it's plausible that they would be given protection from them with armour.

Wikipedia: War Elephant → here you can see a few tapestries and paintings depicting elephants in armour, although some were just barely armoured.

Elephant armour from India. 17th century. Composed of 5,840 plates, weighing 118kg - On Pinterest

^This armour's weight seems abit dubious to me but the principle of the armour's structure is convincing. As you can see the legs aren't protected but the head and the torso is, much like how it is depectied in those pictures and similar to some horse armour.

I really doubt elephants could be defeated by axing their legs, their skin and muscles are pretty thick and they sweep their head and thus their trunk while surrounded, would you really want to be that guy, who'd go up close and try to have a chance at his legs?

Elephants were mostly defeated by javelins and arrows if the elephant was not as armoured or made bewildered by groups of soldiers carrying trumpets. Also keep in mind that it'd took quite a number of javelins/spears/arrows to wear an elephant down. Despite that they did not guarantee victory, they were used as portable archer towers and could lower the opponent's morale if they weren't not experienced troops. They could be very effective if utilized appropriately.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.