11

The decisive battle of the Great Northern War between Sweden and Russia was the battle of Poltava. That's located deep in the Ukraine, southeast of Kiev, between Cherkassy and Kharkov.

That seems like a strange place for a Swedish army, especially one based on the Baltic in Livonia (which encompasses Latvia and Estonia). One would expect such an army to march east to Moscow, or perhaps north to the newly-founded city of St. Petersburg.

Apparently Sweden's King Charles XII had led his army west across Poland, all the way to occupy Saxony (the home of the elected King of Poland), with the aim of making Poland a puppet state, then back east across Poland for an invasion of Russia via "Lithuania," (which then also included modern Belarus and parts of the Ukraine).

Did King Charles XII create a new "base" in southern Polish cities like Krakow and Lublin from which to draw supplies and reinforcements for what would then be a logical invasion of the Ukraine? Was he trying to conquer Ukraine on behalf of his new Polish allies? Or were the allies in question perhaps the Turks (natural enemies of Russia)? If so, were they supplying him across the Black Sea, and up the Dniepr River?

What was he doing at Poltava? Was he trying to "go around" the main Russian army and take Moscow from the rear? Basically it doesn't make sense for a Swedish army to be that far south, except possibly at the head of a "grand coalition" involving other countries.

  • I don't have references handy ATM but from vague recollections the theory of "doing it on behalf of Poland" seems the most plausible. – DVK Dec 13 '11 at 15:28
  • 1
    "Behalf of Poland" isn't correct, since Charles had conquered Poland himself! – Oldcat Sep 18 '15 at 0:01
6

Here is the map: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grosser_Nordischer_Krieg_Phase1.png

Most important Swedish allies became the Ukrainians under Mazepa. Initially, Charles XII was going south to conquer them, but until he got there they decided to join forces against Russia. Mazepa had been promised an independent Ukraine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Mazepa

The weak Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not a real player, despite most of the war happened on its territory. Neither was Ottoman Empire (the Turks).

  • 1
    Nonsense. At the start of 18 cent. Ottoman Empire was one of superpowers yet. – Gangnus Feb 16 '16 at 16:03
  • @Gangnus is right. Although Poltava was indeed the decisive battle of that war, the war continued for another 12 years, and one of reasons for that was that Russians couldn't capture Charles XII due to Ottoman interference. Although it is true that in this period they preferred to reinforce their positions in Balkans and trying to expand into Austria and Italy to fighting Russians. – Danila Smirnov Oct 30 '17 at 3:20
6

A further look at the map that kubanczyk posted indicates another part of the story: the original campaign objective was indeed Moscow. However, Charles had to halt at about Smolensk (the last major stop on the eastbound route to Moscow) and to give up the idea of marching on to Moscow because his supply train (led by General Lewenhaupt) couldn't make the rendevouz with the main army on time. Plan B was turning to summer quarters in Ukraine, which was supposed to be rich (true) and friendly (false).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.