Reading up on the beginnings of human spaceflight, I came across this line on Wikipedia:

[Vostok 1] was flown in an automatic mode as a precaution; medical science at that time did not know what would happen to a human in the weightlessness of space.

What did people think would happen to human beings in weightlessness? Ideally, I'm looking for medical opinions from before 1961, but any reference would be better than what I have right now.

  • I believe the main concerns were in regard to whether an astronaut (or cosmonaut) would be capable of operating the vehicle. It was unknown to what extent motion-sickness and other nausea might impair the pilot's capacity. Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 3:52
  • 4
    I imagine there was, until actual evidence was acquired, every shade of opinion from, "no effect" to being "driven mad". For example when steam trains were developed it was thought that travelling a 30mph would suck all the air out of a humans body and they would die of asphyxiation being unable to breathe, especially when travelling through something like Brunel's Box tunnel Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 7:55
  • I think the main fear was that you would pass out, or get so bad motion sickness that you would be unable to fly, etc. Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 8:00

2 Answers 2


NASA had known experimentally what near weightlessness felt like at least since 1959, when the famous "Vomit Comet" had enabled humans to experience the condition for up to 25 seconds at a time. This plane followed a nearly parabolic flight path to produce the sensation of weightlessness.

Hence there was no reason before the first human spaceflight to believe something terrible might happen to astronauts such as inner organs rupturing. Flight trajectory for a typical zero-gravity flight maneuver

Flight trajectory for a typical zero-gravity flight maneuver. Image credit: NASA (public domain)

  • -1 1. That was NASA. 2. 25 seconds is not comparable to the hour or more that Gagarin was in orbit. Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 7:57
  • 2
    x-15 15 mins of weightlessnes 1958 history.nasa.gov/SP-4201/ch2-3.htm also see the the research references quoted in the link as they are early scientific papers going back to WW2 Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 14:02
  • 1
    @JamesWoolfenden: Right, but even those 15 minutes were pretty inconclusive, and there is no indication the Russians has any information like that. Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 15:20
  • 1
    They did put animals up first though. Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 15:53
  • 1
    @James I was thinking to use your references to expand on my answer (giving you proper credit, of course) but am prevented at the moment from carrying out on that plan. Hence I am hoping that you would write your own Answer and collect a dozen upvotes :) Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 19:18

Before science, Speculation from Sci-Fi back to 1873 and Jules Verne "From the Earth to the Moon:Around the Moon"

Read it in full yourself from project Guttenberg here http://www.gutenberg.org/files/16457/16457-h/16457-h.htm the section in chapter VIII the neutral point starting: "From the moment they had left the Earth, their own weight..."

Then in 1948 - Dr. Hubertus Strughold "The father of Space medicine" having worked prewar and during, is the first researcher in field on the physical effects of weightlessness. He is editor of "German Aviation Medicine in World War II" the first published scientific work on Weightlessness in a chapter called “Man under Gravity Free Conditions” by Heinz Haber and O. Gauer [1,2]


1.Benford RJ. German aviation medicine during World War II. Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office; 1948

2.Campbell MR et al. 2007 Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine http://spacemedicineassociation.org/timeline/1949/Strughold%20Accomplishments.pdf

There is a wealth of information on the science of space medicine....


They have a timeline of space medicine here: http://spacemedicineassociation.org/timeline/timeline.htm

  • 4
    These are some really great links, but in the future they might not last. If you fold in some of their information into your answer, it would be a very informative answer.
    – Joe
    Commented Aug 15, 2013 at 16:38
  • 4
    I was all poised to vote this up, but never came across the actual information. :-(
    – T.E.D.
    Commented Aug 15, 2013 at 19:26
  • There is a lot of information on the sites indicated. I could repost their words verbatim or reword like a senior but i'm trying not to plagarise, the links are primary Sources and established sites/organisations. Commented Aug 15, 2013 at 20:39
  • @JamesWoolfenden, since you're citing the sources for the information, there's no question of plagarism.
    – Joe
    Commented Aug 19, 2013 at 17:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.