There's likely no such thing. Different societies have different ways of doing things, regardless of how relatively "primitive" they are. That's why we call them "cultures".

Take your topic of the roles and status of women. It varies by culture, and is ultimately fairly random. There will usually be **a** division, as men will likely insist on taking the more dangerous work (eg: hunting large game and war), but otherwise it can be fairly arbitrary what roles get assigned to what genders, and how strict the segregation is. 

For instance, in North America, farming was viewed by most tribes as "women's work", which ended up being a huge cultural barrier once Europeans arrived on the continent. 

Marriage standards (eg: linearity, level of official monogamy) also appear to be a cultural thing. Many societies outside of the Eurasian sphere were/are matrilineal, while similar neighbors are not. Within Eurasia, European societies tended more to very strict monogamy, near east societies to polygamy, and Chinese society to a kind of middle-ground. 

Point being it really doesn't make sense to try to talk about specifics of gender roles solely based on societal development, because all evidence we have points to it not being based on that at all.<sup>*</sup>

<sup> * - Of course we could do something silly like arbitrarily call our own culture "advanced", and then start to reason *all* about other societies with other systems like they are inferior entities who simply have yet to achieve our own level. But we wouldn't do that, would we?</sup>