Robert Temple has zero credibility in archaeology. He's written multiple ancient-astronaut books, one of the quotes on his web page about his books is from an author of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, and his page about Egyptian Dawn includes these points:
Exposing faked evidence which has been credulously accepted by the Egyptological community.
Per the Wikipedia article:
At the end of the twelfth century al-Malek al-Aziz Othman ben Yusuf, Saladin's son and heir, attempted to demolish the pyramids starting with Menkaure's pyramid. The workmen who Al-Aziz had recruited to demolish the pyramid found it almost as expensive to destroy as to build. They stayed at their job for eight months. They were ...
Pyramid-building declined (in size and quality) during the 5th and 6th dynasties (c. 2450 to 2175 BC) of the Old Kingdom after reaching a peak during the 4th dynasty (c. 2575 to 2450 BC). We don't know for certain why this decline happened, but the economic cost of such large projects and a lessening of central authority were probably the main ...
Maybe your source was National Geographics. However, it completely fails at explaining where this theory comes from and which facts speak in its favor (it prefers to present it as a fact). This BBC article does only a marginally better job, it lists some evidence but one is bound to ask whether a different interpretation of the same evidence wouldn't have ...
The implication of the question is that Meso-American cultures didn't employ any architectural defenses ("walls"). I don't think that's true at all.
Below is a pictoral recreation of Cahokia. That city was probably far too large and spread out to totally wall up, but you can clearly see there was a wall around the central districts. The text with the ...
In Greek times the authority on the pyramids was Herodotus who visited Egypt about 100 years before Ptolemaic rule began. Even at that time the pyramids were a tourist attraction surrounded by a lot of mythology. According to Herodotus the Great Pyramid was built by "Cheops" about 600 years previously (circa 1000 BC).
Modern scholars presume that by Cheops, ...
A resource for the directions of the shafts would be the webpage of the discoverer Mr. Gantenbrinck:
But you would need a Java plugin to view the CAD-drawings.
That said, and as Tyler Durden has pointed out and has been IMHO wrongly downvoted:
Only Khufu's pyramid has shafts, not Khafre, not Menkaure and no other
The shafts ...
Generally, the thieves entered the pyramids through tunnels. A number of these tunnels still survive, like the one used to enter the Pyramid of Senusret III at Dahshur.
It is believed that the robbers were probably some of the same people that built the pyramids, since they knew where the chambers were within the pyramids.
The tunnels weren't built with ...
How many stones high are the pyramids of Giza?
Which pyramid at Giza? They're all different.
The simple answer is Cheops is now 201 and was originally about 210, but it doesn't mean what you think it means. The layer heights were not consistent, their heights were not precise, the slopes of different pyramids were not consistent, and what we see today is ...
I believe many did.
Hopewell (mound builders) :
This Hopewell mound in Newark Ohio looks an awe-full lot like a circular wall with a gate in the upper left hand corner.
regarding the Inca, these look like defensive walls to me.
Just for completeness:
Peter Diehr is correct, Manetho, who lived during the Ptolemeic era (which has several kings named Ptolemy) wrote a book about the royal dynasties of Egypt. His sources must have been royal annals, which would record the name of the pharaohs and how long they reigned.
The original book is lost, and only shortened and inaccurate ...
That we don't know exactly how they did it doesn't mean that we can't duplicate what they did. There are no exact descriptions of precisely how the great pyramids were built, and that means we will never know for sure how they were built. But it does not mean that they had some ancient and mysterious knowledge that has been lost, or that it was aliens, or ...
One documented example of this practice can be found very early in the history of Egypt, in the burials of Hierakonpolis
Although all the satellite tombs have been heavily plundered and less than half the complex has been explored, enough remains of their contents to suggest that there was nothing arbitrary about their layout or their occupants. Near the ...
It appears the consensus is indicating multiple colors.
In Mesopotamia the seven stages of a ziggurat were each painted a
different color, the colors being emblematic of the seven planets
Handcock Mesopotamian Archaeology p 273
The Uses of Symbolism in Greek Art ...By Janet M. Macdonald
The above quote from a book in 1922, and it appears to be ...
For a pyramid to be "half an octahedron", its height must be the width divided by sqrt(2).
Examination of the List of Egyptian pyramids shows that this is not the case.
Sneferu: 220/(105*sqrt(2)) = 1.481557
Khufu: 230.3/(146.6*sqrt(2)) = 1.110823
Menkaure: 103.4/(65.5*sqrt(2)) = 1.116257
i.e., they are flatter than "half an octahedron".
Well the answer is they didn't. The pyramids were built by pulling blocks up on ramps.
^ that is probably what it looked like.
Herodotus's machine did exist according to painting but it was probably not used to build the pyramids like he said. But it was used for getting water out of the nile river.
The second theory centers on Herodotus's machines. Until ...
No. That is impossible. Continental drift is a geological phenomena millions, if not billions of years, in progress.
You probably wonder why those constructions look fairly similar. Mesoamericans and Egyptians both discovered independent of each other that stacking stones that way is very durable.
At the end of the twelfth century al-Malek al-Aziz Othman ben Yusuf, Saladin's son and heir, attempted to demolish the pyramids starting with Menkaure's pyramid. The workmen who Al-Aziz had recruited to demolish the pyramid found it almost as expensive to destroy as to build. They stayed at their job for eight months. They were not able to remove more than ...
The three great pyramids of Giza are not in a straight line.
The two largest pyramids are arranged Northeast-Southwest of one another.
The 225-degree line of bearing through Giza (NE-SW) does not even pass through South America at all, much less through Peru. The yellow line below is this bearing:
Mark Lehner talks about this a bit in The Complete Pyramids, he mentions that they are oriented to Orion. (cf. Bauval R.G., 'A master-plan of the three pyramids of Giza Plateau based on the configuration of the three stars of the belt of Orion', Discussions in Egyptology 13 (1989), 7-18) His bibliography is very useful.
"The 'air shafts' extend like ...
There are shafts only in the largest pyramid and none have been found in the others.
The shafts actually make strange and irregular turns at various points, so there is no single "angle" or visage at a particular location in the sky. The depictions you see in books are idealized.
The mode of construction of the shafts is utilitarian and they seem to have ...