Hot answers tagged

18

Apparently yes, that is one possible way of reading one surviving inscription. But it is not so clear cut easy. This is evidenced by one find, a rather isolated appearance from Ephesos: often interpreted as 'all slaves sold into the province of Asia had to be tattooed "tax paid" by the tax farmers.' As shown on Wikipedia: Slavery in ancient Rome#...


15

Short Answer How true Jeanne Marie Neumann's statement is depends on, firstly, the definition of familia used and, secondly, the circumstances of individual freedmen and freedwomen. As one classicist has noted, the Roman family is an ambiguous concept and defies easy definition. Thus, without some qualification, Neumann is over-generalizing; there were ...


8

Which was the official position of the Catholic Church on the Atlantic Slave Trade? This is going to be a very complicated answer to say the least, especially when we see that the Apostle St. Paul himself never spoke out against slavery in the Apostolic Times. The institution of slavery was an accepted and deeply established part of Roman society. Before ...


7

For its first seven decades the federal government was supported almost entirely by customs revenue, not taxes on slaves. Slavery's most direct connection to taxation occurred at the state/local level via property taxation. Einhorn's work on this topic is very good. Additional sources on antebellum politics, slavery, and property taxation can be found in the ...


5

Probably coincidental - the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, section 9) says: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars ...


2

The things differed a lot between civilizations, status of slaves and the rewards promised for going to war. First of all, there was no single, the same notion of "slavery" throughout history. What in Muslim world is translated as "slave" could have a different meaning at the time and place where it was used. For instance, one could ...


2

Slaves were considered a capital asset not just labor. By 1861 almost half the total value of the South's capital assets was in the "value of negroes". They were taxable wealth. When slaves were freed the slave owners lost over $2 billion in capital. Most agricultural societies the most valuable asset is land, in the South it was slaves. They ...


2

Coffroth was a moderate When we talk about American society during and immediately before Civil War, we could roughly divide it into three groups. First were abolitionists, centered among Republicans, especially Radical Republicans and they demanded immediate end of institution of slavery in the Union. It must be said that even more moderate Republicans, ...


1

Here are some rough economic facts for a start. The North had four times the GDP of the South. The North had 22 million people. The South had 9.5 million people, of which just under 4.0 million were slaves, so 5.5 million white people. If you divide the white populations, you get a four to one North/South ratio, the same as the GDP ratio. This means that the ...


1

At the very least, we can say that Patrick thought that people being enslaved was a bad thing. Patrick wrote two surviving works. One of them was the Confessions, another was titled A Letter to the Soldiers of Coroticus. In the latter, Patrick notes in a very displeased manner that “For they have been taken far away and abandoned in a land where sin abounds, ...


1

A different question but related Slavery economically advantageous? If cotton is taken to be a significant driver of the practice of slavery it can be argued that slavery was not in decline leading up to the Civil War. Cotton exports summary: 1820 America Exported 250,000 bales worth $22 million 1840 America Exported 1.5 million bales worth $64 million ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible