New answers tagged

2

Smolensk was the first place where soviets tried to put a defensive line because that region is the only place where no important rivers serve as natural barriers in the east-west direction. Daugava (western Dvina) and Dnieper rivers turn east in that zone. Russia needs to defend that place in order to prevent direct advance to Moscow. So, you're right, ...


0

TL;DR: Terrain does not win battles, soldiers win battles. Your question is explained by the chosen german objectives and where soviet decided to defend those objectives. In a operational area so huge as the Caucasus is, one first has to take into account the following: You won't have a continous front, instead you'll have small areas where armies ...


1

It looks like the Soviet Union kept peace by damping out nationalism. Near the end of the cold war, when Gorbachev allowed nationalism, was when the setting for post-Soviet conflicts took root. [Azerbaijan-Armenia] hatreds are not ancient: The first large-scale ethnic clashes between Armenians and Azerbaijanis took place as late as in 1905, during a period ...


8

In case you are interested in primary sources, here is one, from "Alexander N. Yakovlev's Archives", here. Документ № 172. "Беседа председателя Совнаркома, наркома иностранных дел СССР В.М. Молотова с рейхсканцлером Германии А. Гитлером в Берлине." 12.11.1940. ... Гитлер отвечает, что тройственный пакт предусматривает руководящую роль в ...


9

You are confusing the dates and two separate German-Soviet negotiations. The German-Soviet "Non-aggression pact" (Also called the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact) was signed in Moscow on 23 August 1939. This pact had a secret protocol, dividing the "spheres of influence". The result was a partition of Poland, and Soviet conquests of the Baltic ...


0

Partially We could identify four main objectives for Army Group B during summer/autumn 1942. Let's examine them separately : Eliminate Stalingrad as industrial center. Arguably, this was already achieved with huge Luftwaffe raids in late August, with further destruction by aerial and artillery strikes latter in the battle. For this, of course, it was not ...


17

Interpretations are called for here — and these are necessarily opinionated to a degree. From a recent Polish perspective, it might seem rather simple – and one-sided: There are strong indications that Beijing's position, which opposed armed intervention, had a significant influence on the Kremlin. This was by no means out of warm attitudes towards Gomułka ...


2

Leaving the Soviets in possession of part of the west bank of the Volga within the city would mean that the Germans would not have a secure front. The Soviets would have been capable of supplying and reinforcing their troops via small boats at night. That would allow them to keep the front within the city active, soaking up German manpower and supplies. The ...


Top 50 recent answers are included