Timeline for Is there a reason for a Queen's husband not to be referred to as King?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2020 at 4:55 | history | edited | Tom Au |
edited tags
|
|
| May 21, 2018 at 22:25 | comment | added | TheHonRose | @Anixx And the King's wife is a brood mare - as Katherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn discovered, to their cost! | |
| Feb 7, 2018 at 0:09 | comment | added | MAGolding | There was no Queen Mary III in England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain or the United Kingdom. The husband of Queens Mary of Scotland (well 2 out of 3), Mary I, and Mary II were kings. the premises of the question are flawed. | |
| Feb 6, 2018 at 23:59 | answer | added | MAGolding | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 23:07 | history | protected | Schwern | ||
| Nov 20, 2016 at 21:00 | comment | added | Doctor Zhivago | The entire "Regency" stands on ceremony so "a Queen with no King" means whatever you think it does. Just ask the Queen...very carefully tho... | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 18:33 | comment | added | jamesqf | @Tyler Durden: Not even if you are Hamlet's uncle. The kings of Denmark were elected, so Claudius "Popp'd in between the election and my (Hamlet's) hopes" to be chosen King, and then married Gertrude. | |
| Nov 20, 2016 at 14:35 | answer | added | Hans Stoltenberg | timeline score: -1 | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 15:31 | comment | added | Tyler Durden | Marrying a queen does not make you a king, unless you are Hamlet's uncle. | |
| Oct 28, 2015 at 13:03 | answer | added | TheHonRose | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 2, 2014 at 18:48 | history | edited | Tea Drinker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 12, 2012 at 17:28 | answer | added | MCW♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| Dec 11, 2012 at 22:57 | comment | added | Felix Goldberg | @Anixx: Brutal, but true..:) | |
| Dec 11, 2012 at 19:17 | history | edited | choster |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 18, 2012 at 17:49 | vote | accept | canadiancreed | ||
| Jun 11, 2012 at 17:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jun 11, 2012 at 22:32 | |||||
| Jun 8, 2012 at 4:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jun 8, 2012 at 4:52 | |||||
| Jun 6, 2012 at 19:10 | comment | added | Anixx | The queen's husband is just a sperm donor. | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 17:39 | answer | added | Tom Au | timeline score: 16 | |
| S Jun 6, 2012 at 16:36 | history | suggested | Luke_0 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected grammatical errors
|
| Jun 6, 2012 at 16:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackHistory/status/210409599734521858 | ||
| Jun 6, 2012 at 16:31 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 6, 2012 at 16:36 | |||||
| Jun 6, 2012 at 12:37 | answer | added | Apoorv | timeline score: 41 | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 10:12 | comment | added | o0'. | @LouisRhys put that in an answer :) | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 6:23 | comment | added | Louis Rhys | maybe because "King" carries a higher rank than "Queen", so elevating someone to be King might outrank the actual monarch (the Queen), so it is to be avoided, but making someone a Queen would not outrank the King, so it's ok | |
| Jun 6, 2012 at 5:33 | history | asked | canadiancreed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |