Timeline for Why was there never a tachanka-style cannon or crossbow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:02 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jun 27, 2016 at 12:03 | comment | added | user1095108 | BTW: The katyusha also had a problem with recoil, it could not fire sideways, because of the danger of toppling over. | |
| Jun 27, 2016 at 8:21 | comment | added | user1095108 | Please note, that I'm asking my question for a huge time span, from the fall of the Roman empire (5th century AD to the time of the Ballonabwehrkanone/tachanka). No nation was industrialized at the fall of the Roman empire. It would be interesting to know, if the Zamburak was used against Rome/Byzantium. | |
| Jun 27, 2016 at 3:37 | comment | added | user1095108 | In the middle ages, you could have a volley gun mounted on a cart, which would eliminated the recoil issue, but it never happened for some reason. For all I know a crossbow cart might still have been effective, at least for some time. | |
| Jun 27, 2016 at 1:29 | history | edited | SJuan76 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 241 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2016 at 21:03 | history | edited | SJuan76 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 132 characters in body
|
| Jun 26, 2016 at 20:38 | history | answered | SJuan76 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |