Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 19, 2016 at 8:09 vote accept Tom Au
Aug 2, 2016 at 10:23 comment added Anaryl Through which mechanisms do you believe economics and politics were the drivers of stalemate on the Western Front?
Aug 2, 2016 at 9:19 comment added Gangnus @Anaryl economics and inner politics were the real reasons. As for inventions, every invention on one side was answered by an invention on the other side. Some inventions broke stalemate only once, some never. As for MOBILE storm groups, the whole technology tree was not ripe enough for them. Even in WWII the war was manoeuvre only in places of maximal concentration of the best technology.
Aug 2, 2016 at 8:29 comment added Anaryl @Gangnus Economics surely played a part by the war's end but it was not the sole reason. Whited's Law.
Aug 2, 2016 at 7:38 comment added Gangnus So, the both eastern and western fronts had long period when armies stood still in trench wars. OK. You say in fact that they on the Eastern side moved far simply because they had enough place. Utter nonsense without any logic. if the only difference was the place, Germans would simply take Paris. Command? You name it the second reason and at once say it was not the reason, but the economics was. And the main reason - why they broke front on the East more times remains unanswered.
Aug 2, 2016 at 1:46 comment added enderland You typed all that without a space bar? You're crazy.
Aug 1, 2016 at 17:42 history edited Anaryl CC BY-SA 3.0
managed expectations
Aug 1, 2016 at 17:36 history edited Anaryl CC BY-SA 3.0
managed expectations
Aug 1, 2016 at 17:16 history edited Anaryl CC BY-SA 3.0
managed expectations
Aug 1, 2016 at 17:07 history answered Anaryl CC BY-SA 3.0