Timeline for Cold War proxy countries views on nationalism or decolonization?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2017 at 7:43 | comment | added | SJuan76 | The issue that I have with this question is that countries hate being antropomorphized. Countries do not see, countries do not value. Contries are not people so they cannot. And people inside a country often have different agendas. For example, it is not that in 1953 Iran "did change its stance" about oil industry nationalization, it is that a different government with a different stance came to power. | |
| Sep 2, 2017 at 0:37 | answer | added | Tom Au | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 1, 2017 at 20:55 | comment | added | The_MN_MechE | Fair enough! Will come back with any questions | |
| Sep 1, 2017 at 20:49 | comment | added | MCW♦ | I suspect the obvious answer is true - some of them knew what they were getting into and they thought the bargain was worth the price. I think even a cursory review of colonialism on wikipedia would be sufficient to demonstrate that. | |
| Sep 1, 2017 at 20:47 | comment | added | The_MN_MechE | I've taken a class a few years ago on it but knew that not all of the proxy countries had previous control by another country. I just wanted to know if they "knew what they were getting into" | |
| Sep 1, 2017 at 20:44 | history | edited | MCW♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Sep 1, 2017 at 20:44 | comment | added | MCW♦ | This question would benefit from research. | |
| Sep 1, 2017 at 20:33 | history | asked | The_MN_MechE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |