Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 13, 2018 at 3:42 comment added jamesqf @Schwern: Unprepared is one thing. Launching attack after attack when all you accomplish is running up your casualty count is failing to learn from experience.
Jun 11, 2018 at 18:19 comment added Schwern @jamesqf While there is plenty of stupidity to go around, the more I study WWI the more I see armies and staffs generally unprepared to deal with the combination of radically more efficient weapons plus a static defense line and lacked the communication, organization, and mobile firepower to deal with it. While they should have been better prepared for the new weaponry, I don't think they could have anticipated an entire front going static; the Eastern Front was more to expectations. However, they could have adapted faster.
Jun 10, 2018 at 17:45 comment added jamesqf I suggest changing "inadequacy of tactics" to "sheer stupidity of tactics".
Jun 10, 2018 at 15:00 comment added Angelo Fuchs The Battle of Changping should be noted as having 700k in a small area (although unclear of how small that battlefield actually was.) as most of the casualties were captured soldiers that were buried together there.
Jun 8, 2018 at 22:28 comment added Schwern @Mr.Mindor Just eyeballing a map of the First Battle of the Somme, it looks like the allies advanced in three phases over the 140 days of the battle. Each phase advanced about a mile or two. This represented an intense series of battles across a thin no-man's land (10 to hundreds of yards) leading to a German retreat to secondary trenches. A blow-by-blow examination of the battle would be necessary to determine how many died per each square mile.
Jun 8, 2018 at 21:58 comment added Mr.Mindor Any reference by chance for how wide that 20 mile line is?
Jun 8, 2018 at 17:51 history answered Schwern CC BY-SA 4.0