Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 10, 2018 at 17:52 comment added jamesqf @JF F: Strictly speaking, there was no Stalingrad during WWI. The city was called Tsaritsyn until 1925, and renamed to Volgograd in 1961: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volgograd It doesn't seem to have played a part in WWI, though there was fighting during the Communist takeover.
Jun 10, 2018 at 10:38 comment added Quintin @Ily If you only count the civilians, yes. If you count the soldiers, possibly not.
Jun 10, 2018 at 10:29 comment added lly In any case, Russia's extremely low population density speaks against it having anything approaching a contender to this question. Any death it saw in WWII or under Stalin is already dwarfed (particularly if we're speaking in terms of density) by the abattoir China became during the same period... let alone the rest of its much longer history.
Jun 10, 2018 at 10:25 comment added lly 'and W=the strength of the will'... I feel like something is being badly mistranslated from German here...
S Jun 9, 2018 at 21:30 history suggested J F CC BY-SA 4.0
Slightly clarify wording
Jun 9, 2018 at 21:04 review Suggested edits
S Jun 9, 2018 at 21:30
Jun 9, 2018 at 20:54 comment added Quintin It could be. The point I am hoping to make is that Stalingrad had, with the exception of five terrible months (Aug 1942 to Jan 1943), been mostly peaceful for the duration of modernity - which included the 52 'other' months of the Second World War in Europe.
Jun 9, 2018 at 20:05 comment added J F For example, Stalingrad was completely razed during the Second World War, but it did not see violence for the entire duration of the Second World War” Should one of those be “First World War”?
Jun 9, 2018 at 16:35 history edited Quintin CC BY-SA 4.0
added 88 characters in body
Jun 9, 2018 at 13:26 history answered Quintin CC BY-SA 4.0