Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 7, 2018 at 5:27 vote accept user4951
Sep 6, 2018 at 9:42 vote accept user4951
Sep 7, 2018 at 5:27
Sep 6, 2018 at 4:01 answer added Jos timeline score: 1
Sep 5, 2018 at 23:59 comment added Daniel Shield is on your left so the left is protected. Weapon is on your right. Flanking is what often resulted in a win and was a major purpose of cavalry.
S Sep 5, 2018 at 21:38 history suggested Abraham Ray
This tag makes sense to me to use
Sep 5, 2018 at 19:08 review Suggested edits
S Sep 5, 2018 at 21:38
Sep 5, 2018 at 18:48 answer added Schwern timeline score: 7
Sep 5, 2018 at 15:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackHistory/status/1037354798532780035
Sep 5, 2018 at 14:59 comment added MCW Isn't that called an infantry square?
Sep 5, 2018 at 14:55 comment added bukwyrm Could you include all pertinent parts of the Text that you are referring to in your Question? Questions here should be self-contained. ---- Also, if they turn around and have an orderly phalanx pointing to their former rear, it's not really 'behind' the phalanx any more, is it? ---- Imagine a phalanx marching forth, some enemy brawlers hidden in some hole to the side, they pop up, race up to the back of the phalanx, stab and slash, then make a run for it. No way will the back of the phalanx get the info about them in time to react in an orderly fashion - side sees them, calls, too late.
Sep 5, 2018 at 14:16 answer added Daniel timeline score: 6
Sep 4, 2018 at 18:01 comment added Giter The left half of the shield is meant to cover the exposed right side of the person to their left. Having left-handed people hold the shield in their right hand would protect their exposed right side, but their left side is still exposed and now the right side of the person to their left is also exposed.
Sep 4, 2018 at 17:45 comment added Pieter Geerkens re "And what's with the left of phalanx unprotected? They don't have lefties holding shield on right arms?" My understanding is that this obvious remedy was always employed, but historians seem to /doubt/deny it for some reason.
Sep 4, 2018 at 17:41 history asked user4951 CC BY-SA 4.0