Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 1, 2019 at 16:46 history edited LаngLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0
added 193 characters in body
Jun 29, 2019 at 17:15 history edited LаngLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0
added 5453 characters in body
May 13, 2019 at 16:40 history edited LаngLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0
added 906 characters in body
May 12, 2019 at 11:25 history edited LаngLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0
added 143 characters in body
May 12, 2019 at 10:36 history edited LаngLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0
added 3308 characters in body
May 12, 2019 at 10:05 history edited LаngLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4298 characters in body
May 11, 2019 at 19:57 history edited LаngLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1190 characters in body
May 11, 2019 at 19:30 comment added LаngLаngС @PieterGeerkens Why does it have to be assumed that a culture "migrates", when over more than 1000 years cultures change, merge & newly emerge. On the one hand I do say (like you) that climate and crop fecundity might have played a role. But: As Morris said: "We frankly do not know why farming did finally move north after 4200 BCE." And the ascribed significance to 4200 is most probably one we construct. That's the FC to the Q "what was the event?": I argue that there was no event.
May 11, 2019 at 18:05 review Low quality posts
May 11, 2019 at 18:35
May 11, 2019 at 17:58 comment added Pieter Geerkens I see no attempt in this post, anywhere, to explain how or why the century around 4200 BCE would be significant in the migration of an agricultural culture.
May 11, 2019 at 17:49 history answered LаngLаngС CC BY-SA 4.0