Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 25, 2020 at 10:29 vote accept Dave
Nov 21, 2020 at 13:50 comment added Spencer @DougDeden This use of "never" would probably make a good question on ELU.
Nov 19, 2020 at 14:42 comment added Andrew is gone @RonJohn the OED has "never a X: not a single X, no —— at all" attested from the thirteenth century onwards, so it looks a reasonably sound interpretation.
Nov 19, 2020 at 5:38 comment added Doug Deden @RonJohn Nope. No evidence. Just speculation. I'll see what I can find, but you should never hold your breath. :-)
Nov 19, 2020 at 4:46 comment added RonJohn @Semaphore an interesting thesis; what's some evidence that it was used in this manner in Early Modern English?
Nov 19, 2020 at 0:40 comment added Semaphore @RonJohn I believe the "never" here should read as "not in any way". The word "ever" still retains this sense: see for instance "how ever did you know" or "how can I ever repay you".
S Nov 19, 2020 at 0:32 history suggested Ángel CC BY-SA 4.0
Powell (spotted by Doug) and extra not
Nov 19, 2020 at 0:04 comment added RonJohn @DougDeden perhaps "never" ... but didn't yet have its "for all time" meaning. That's an interesting thesis. Do you have any evidence?
Nov 18, 2020 at 23:46 review Suggested edits
S Nov 19, 2020 at 0:32
Nov 18, 2020 at 23:22 comment added Doug Deden @RonJohn Considering that it is in a earlier flavor of English, perhaps "never" had its negative meaning, but didn't yet have its "for all time" meaning. So a modern translation would be more like "could speak not a word of English".
Nov 18, 2020 at 23:18 history edited Semaphore CC BY-SA 4.0
added 59 characters in body
Nov 18, 2020 at 20:43 comment added RonJohn "and could speake never a word of English". Unless his son Edward died before age 1, I'm dubious how that part of the story would be true.
Nov 18, 2020 at 12:17 history edited Semaphore CC BY-SA 4.0
added 40 characters in body
Nov 18, 2020 at 11:58 history answered Semaphore CC BY-SA 4.0