Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 6, 2021 at 6:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackHistory/status/1390184559849914370
May 3, 2021 at 17:24 comment added user15620 This site has a bit more concrete information. (But nothing newer i believe, so not an answer)
May 3, 2021 at 6:09 history edited parktomatomi CC BY-SA 4.0
added 816 characters in body
May 3, 2021 at 5:12 comment added parktomatomi That's fair, I changed the word to "relatives". Thanks. I'm not knowledgeable about DNA testing, but the significance seems to be that both Richard and the donors all have a direct male link to Edward III
May 3, 2021 at 5:11 history edited parktomatomi CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4 characters in body
May 3, 2021 at 5:10 comment added C Monsour Also, your last sentence in your question is off. Richard's sons had no known offspring. There are no "his descendants" for a Y chromosome comparison.
May 3, 2021 at 5:05 comment added parktomatomi According to this guardian article from the time, five living anonymous donors. That article links to this nature paper which states "Y-chromosome haplotypes from male-line relatives and the remains do not match, which could be attributed to a false-paternity event occurring in any of the intervening generations. "
May 3, 2021 at 4:59 comment added C Monsour Which male line descendants of John of Gaunt didn't "match" (we're talking distant cousins) Richard's DNA?
May 3, 2021 at 4:48 history edited parktomatomi CC BY-SA 4.0
added 106 characters in body
May 3, 2021 at 4:21 history edited Lars Bosteen CC BY-SA 4.0
added 28 characters in body
May 3, 2021 at 4:13 history edited Lars Bosteen CC BY-SA 4.0
edited link, added tag
May 3, 2021 at 3:49 review First posts
May 3, 2021 at 4:13
May 3, 2021 at 3:45 history asked parktomatomi CC BY-SA 4.0