Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 13, 2021 at 19:34 comment added Greg Let us be realistic: SU was backstabbing a country which is in a middle of a blitz-war with the most capable army of the continent and its army was in the middle of total collapse. Poland was also totally unprepared to a two front war, initially leading all his army to the German border. I am not sure that doing well in such a situation is something extraordinary.
May 13, 2021 at 15:49 vote accept Tom Au
May 13, 2021 at 8:46 answer added rs.29 timeline score: 4
May 11, 2021 at 11:20 comment added jwenting Katyn forest massacre rings a bell? The mass murder of so many people in so short a time is highly efficient (and no, I'm not defending it at all) and was done on orders from Stavka, so not a loss of command structure at all.
May 11, 2021 at 2:25 history became hot network question
May 10, 2021 at 21:28 answer added Yasskier timeline score: 8
May 10, 2021 at 21:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackHistory/status/1391860611584233474
May 10, 2021 at 19:05 comment added Italian Philosopher 2 remarks: First, the Finnish war can be misleading: there were no shortages of capable military officers who thought the Red Army was doing it the wrong way, they were just not in charge. Khalkin Gol was contemporary, for example. Second, the Red Army's dismal performance in 1941 might be less due to ineptitude in general, but more to the specifics of Stalin's idiotic defense-in-place orders which led, time and again, to massive encirclements that were the sweet spot for German Kesselschlacht doctrine. That would not have been apparent when attacking Poland.
May 10, 2021 at 18:35 comment added Zmur The effect of the repressions is overestimated. There are reports from major military manuvers of the RA before and after the repressions and they generally don't show drastic difference in military operations quality.
May 10, 2021 at 18:25 history asked Tom Au CC BY-SA 4.0