Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye Lennart-Goodbye LennartThere were indeed some serious issues surrounding Kennedy's election in 1960, one of the closest elections in History.
However, the controversies at the time involved contentions regarding voter fraud, principally in Texas, the home state of Lyndon Johnson, Kennedy's running mate, and in Illinois, particularly certain areas of Cook County (Chicago area), which was controlled by the very powerful Democratic political machine led by Mayor Richard J. Daley of Chicago. Having lived through those times, I remember all of this quite well. The radio and the papers at the time were talking constantly about the problems in Chicago that might have an impact on the election's outcome. See United States presidential election, 1960 -Controversies for verification of my primary source. :-)
As for Hewitt's idea that JFK's father was very important in making his son President through elicit means, has Hewitt unearthed some unknown and credible historical evidence supporting his contention? That there were problems with the election of 1960 is established -Goodbye Lennart but 'business as usual' in American politics: Partisan warfare, corrupt political machines, potential voter fraud, etc -Goodbye Lennart issues that have surfaced in so many elections throughout American history - seem to be more than sufficient to explain the 1960 election without resorting to novel and weakly substantiated theories.
