Skip to main content
Question Protected by CommunityBot

Why did Canada, Australia and New Zealand separate from the UK?

I asked this question in various places inon the Web. I haven't received a clear answer.

The USA separated from the UK because the people felt that they arewere not British, and they weren't.

Weren't Canadians/Australians/New Zealanders also descended from the British?

Or was it that UK was unable to administer them for financial reasons? I will not accept this as an answer. In this case why was the UK able to hold ontoon to to Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales?

Why are Canada/Australia/New Zealand not administered from the UK?

Why did Canada, Australia and New Zealand separate from UK?

I asked this question in various places in the Web. I haven't received a clear answer.

The USA separated from the UK because the people felt that they are not British, and they weren't.

Weren't Canadians/Australians/New Zealanders also descended from the British?

Or was it that UK was unable to administer them for financial reasons? I will not accept this as an answer. In this case why was the UK able to hold onto to Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales?

Why are Canada/Australia/New Zealand not administered from the UK?

Why did Canada, Australia and New Zealand separate from the UK?

I asked this question in various places on the Web. I haven't received a clear answer.

The USA separated from the UK because the people felt that they were not British, and they weren't.

Weren't Canadians/Australians/New Zealanders also descended from the British?

Or was it that UK was unable to administer them for financial reasons? I will not accept this as an answer. In this case why was the UK able to hold on to to Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales?

Why are Canada/Australia/New Zealand not administered from the UK?

Added a tag
Link
Steven Drennon
  • 8.5k
  • 6
  • 46
  • 75
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackHistory/status/192434308735176704
Had to make many grammatical changes to reformulate this question in proper English ad to keep this question from being "not unambigous" in the word's of the author :P I have tried not to alter his intent.
Source Link

Why did Canada, Australia and New Zealand got separatedseparate from UK?

I asked this question in various places in the Web. Got no unambiguousI haven't received a clear answer.

The USA got separated from the UK because the people felt that they are not British. And that was true, and they weren't.

Weren't Canadians/Australians/New Zealanders also descended from the British descent?

Or was it that UK was unable to administer them for financial reasons? This can't be acceptedI will not accept this as an answer. WhyIn this case why was the UK able to hold onto to Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales didn't get separated then? And, when the central government become weak, associated states are supposed to help the government.

Then why CanadiansWhy are Canada/AustraliansAustralia/New Zealand got separatednot administered from the UK?

Why Canada, Australia and New Zealand got separated from UK?

I asked this question in various places in the Web. Got no unambiguous answer.

USA got separated because the people felt that they are not British. And that was true.

Weren't Canadians/Australians/New Zealanders from British descent?

Or was it that UK was unable to administer them for financial reasons? This can't be accepted as an answer. Why Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales didn't get separated then? And, when the central government become weak, associated states are supposed to help the government.

Then why Canadians/Australians/New Zealand got separated?

Why did Canada, Australia and New Zealand separate from UK?

I asked this question in various places in the Web. I haven't received a clear answer.

The USA separated from the UK because the people felt that they are not British, and they weren't.

Weren't Canadians/Australians/New Zealanders also descended from the British?

Or was it that UK was unable to administer them for financial reasons? I will not accept this as an answer. In this case why was the UK able to hold onto to Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales?

Why are Canada/Australia/New Zealand not administered from the UK?

Source Link
user806
user806
Loading