Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 7, 2020 at 17:48 comment added Spencer I want to point out this question of @AaronBrick 's.
Jul 6, 2018 at 14:48 comment added Luiz I will repeat here an anecdote from Regine Pernoud: In the XIX c, there were a riot in Iquitos (Peruvian Amazon, east of the Andes). The government needed to send a minister there, ASAP. Which was the fastest way for a single person to travel, with no regard to expenses? Taking mule trails over the Andes, under snow? Nope. The minister took a ship Lima->Panama, another ship Panama->New York, then New York->Belem (Brazil, mouth of amazon), and finally Belem->Manaus->Iquitos. It took a few months. So even small countries may have hard to reach places...
Jul 31, 2015 at 20:43 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackHistory/status/627218014073696256
Jul 29, 2015 at 20:20 vote accept fbence
Jul 24, 2015 at 19:45 answer added Alex timeline score: 20
Jul 24, 2015 at 13:32 history edited two sheds CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Jul 24, 2015 at 13:28 answer added two sheds timeline score: 4
Jul 24, 2015 at 13:26 answer added RI Swamp Yankee timeline score: 12
Jul 24, 2015 at 13:20 comment added T.E.D. @Semaphore - Typical method of travel in those parts probably would have been horseback, not foot, but I still think you have the right of it.
Jul 24, 2015 at 13:00 comment added Semaphore I'd imagine the Mongol Empire would be the leading contender. At its peak and prior to its fracturing, Mongol rule stretched from Ukraine to Manchruia. Google Map says that walking from Kiev to Shenyang takes 1830 hours; so very roughly speaking, it'd take (a lot more, really) 230 days to traverse the empire by walking 8 hours a day.
Jul 24, 2015 at 12:46 comment added o0'. I guess it would be more practical to ask the time from the capital to the farthest point, since I rather doubt the other value has been measured by anyone.
Jul 24, 2015 at 12:30 history asked fbence CC BY-SA 3.0