7

What was the largest empire in human history in terms of the time required to deliver a message from one end of the empire to the other? How long was this time?

  • 4
    I guess it would be more practical to ask the time from the capital to the farthest point, since I rather doubt the other value has been measured by anyone. – o0'. Jul 24 '15 at 12:46
  • 4
    I'd imagine the Mongol Empire would be the leading contender. At its peak and prior to its fracturing, Mongol rule stretched from Ukraine to Manchruia. Google Map says that walking from Kiev to Shenyang takes 1830 hours; so very roughly speaking, it'd take (a lot more, really) 230 days to traverse the empire by walking 8 hours a day. – Semaphore Jul 24 '15 at 13:00
  • 4
    @Semaphore - Typical method of travel in those parts probably would have been horseback, not foot, but I still think you have the right of it. – T.E.D. Jul 24 '15 at 13:20
  • 1
    I will repeat here an anecdote from Regine Pernoud: In the XIX c, there were a riot in Iquitos (Peruvian Amazon, east of the Andes). The government needed to send a minister there, ASAP. Which was the fastest way for a single person to travel, with no regard to expenses? Taking mule trails over the Andes, under snow? Nope. The minister took a ship Lima->Panama, another ship Panama->New York, then New York->Belem (Brazil, mouth of amazon), and finally Belem->Manaus->Iquitos. It took a few months. So even small countries may have hard to reach places... – Luiz Jul 6 '18 at 14:48
12

In terms of the area of control established by communications, unquestionably the British Empire - with telegraph connections to Australia established in 1871, Britain had enormous swaths of the globe - from Tikitiki on the North Island of New Zealand all the way west to Beaver Creek in the Yukon, with stops for the Indian subcontinent and an enormous chunk of Africa along the way - under its direct control with end-to-end communication.

In terms of the length of time it took to reach the farthest corner of the empire, the British still win, with some sea routes to its farthest possessions taking many months even with the sophisticated and well practiced maritime practices of the 19th century. It was much longer with older vessels and navigation techniques.

  • 1
    What have you compared it to? In particular, the French colonial Empire, while markedly smaller was also very wide, reaching Polynesia or the Kerguelen island would also be very long. Even the Dutch or Portuguese controlled very remote territories (the Dutch were among those pioneering the Clipper route and once you reach Australia, you still need some time to reach Indonesia). – Relaxed Jul 5 '18 at 6:41
16

It is a strange way, of course to measure the SIZE of an empire in terms of the TIME of travel from end to end; at different times different means of transportation were available, and it also depended on the season.

But if one accepts this strange criterion, perhaps the Russian empire in the early 19th century is hard to beat: it stretched from Alaska and California to Poland. The only ways to travel from the Far East to the capital was either around the whole Asia, Africa and Europe by sea, or by sledges across Siberia. The land travel from the Far East to St.Petersburg took several months in the best case, usually about 6 months, but sometimes more than a year. Traveling the "other way" (not through the Empire but through America and the Atlantic Ocean) was in fact sometimes faster, because ships travel faster than sledges.

The Mongolian Empire at its largest extent was almost the same size, excluding Alaska and California. It stretched from Korea to Poland, but they probably had better postal service at that time. The speed on land widely varied: it depended on the infrastructure and on the ability to change horses and to buy supplies. A traveler with much money or on an official mission would easier obtain horses and supplies. It also depended on the season: in summer one had many rivers to cross (including very large ones), while in winter they can be easily crossed by sledges on ice.

When Batu and Subutai conquered Poland, the Great Khan Ögedei died in Karakorum. (This was the capital of the empire, about 2/3 of the way from Poland to Korea). He died in December 1241. Batu and Subutai left Poland in the "late spring" 1242. I suppose they left immediately after receiving the news, and that the news was passed in the fastest possible way).

EDIT. On October 7 1852 a Russian diplomatic mission started from StPetersburg to Japan (by sea). Japan has a common boundary with the Russian far East possessions. They arrived to Japan in the beginning of August 1853. So it took 10 months by sea. The mission returned by land. They started on August 15 1854 in the Russian far East, and arrived to StPetersburg on 25 of Februaty 1855. 6 months by land. The travel is described by the secretary of the mission, the famous Russian writer Goncharov in his book Frigate "Pallada".

In 1904/5, during the Russian Japanese war, the Russians sent a fleet (consisting of steam ships) from the Baltic to the far East to fight the Japanese. The fleet departed on 15 October 1904 and arrived to Tsushima straight in Japan on 28 May 1905. At that time a railroad crossing the empire from West to East already existed. So we see that steamships in great hurry made this is 7 months while a sailing ship (perhaps not in so great hurry) made it 50 years earlier in 10 months.

  • 6
    It's not that strange a measurement: difficulty of communication (and thus, control) is often cited as a reason why large empires break up. – Mark Jul 25 '15 at 1:05
  • At the point in time you are referring to Jules Verne was conceiving of the novel Around the World in Eighty Days. Travelling end-end of the Russian Empire would not have been much more difficult as that, as it was in large part the same route. – Pieter Geerkens Jul 25 '15 at 21:48
  • 2
    No. Jules Verne novel refers to the end of 19s century, and I refer to the beginning. In the beginning of 19s century there was no railroads in Russia. – Alex Jul 26 '15 at 7:26
  • 1
    Transsiberian railroad was built in 1891-1916. – Alex Jul 26 '15 at 7:28
4

The answer for land empires may have been the Mongol Empire due to its enormous size. (After seeing @RISwampYankee's answer, he probably has the correct answer over all.) However, the Mongols were not only incredible horsemen but also had a very efficient postal system called the Yam.

According to National Geographic:

At the postal route's zenith, a letter could cross from Kharkhorin in the east to the Caspian Sea on the far western edge of the empire, a distance of some 4,225 miles (6,800 kilometers), in two weeks (an average of about 300 miles, or 480 kilometers, a day). Postal riders continued to deliver the mail until 1949, when the Soviet Union—which then controlled Mongolia—shut down the system in an attempt to erase the history of Genghis Khan from the country.

Of course, the time it would take a message to get from one remote part of the empire to another equally remote part could be considerably longer than two weeks.

  • It is amazing how many mistakes the cite you give contains:-) First of all, Mongolian empire at its best time extended VERY much more: from Korea to Poland (look at the map in Wikiedia). – Alex Jul 24 '15 at 19:35
  • 5
    @Alex: Heh, well I'm not going to pretend to be an expert on the Yam. But I interpret the cite as referring to the postal route's zenith, not the empire's. I don't know the exact coverage of the postal system, but I assume getting a letter from Korea to Poland would likely take way longer than two weeks. – two sheds Jul 24 '15 at 19:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.