3

Leon Trotsky, one of the original founders of the Bolshevik Revolution, was strongly opposed to the leadership and policies of Joseph Stalin. In response to Trotskys public criticism of him, Stalin banished him from the Soviet Union.

In 1924, Lenin died, and Joseph Stalin emerged as leader of the USSR. Against Stalin’s stated policies, Trotsky called for a continuing world revolution that would inevitably result in the dismantling of the Soviet state. He also criticized the new regime for suppressing democracy in the Communist Party and for failing to develop adequate economic planning. In response, Stalin and his supporters launched a propaganda counterattack against Trotsky. In 1925, he was removed from his post in the war commissariat. One year later, he was expelled from the Politburo and in 1927 from the Communist Party. In January 1928, Trotsky began his internal exile in Alma-Ata and the next January was expelled from the Soviet Union outright.

(Source: History Channel)

This seems odd. Stalin had no qualms about arbitrarily executing opponents (he even executed Trotsky's brother in law) Why would he exile one of his harshest critics instead of either killing him - or at the very least keeping him alive but imprisoned? What other factors were at play here ?

4
  • 6
    At that moment he wasn't powerful enough to do that. Later he was, but not at that moment. At the same time, Trotski still had lots of supporters.
    – Jos
    Commented Apr 15, 2019 at 1:24
  • 3
    Um, who do you think had Trotsky killed? I don't think it was Roosevelt....
    – C Monsour
    Commented Apr 15, 2019 at 1:29
  • 3
    @CMonsour True, but that was many years later.
    – Jos
    Commented Apr 15, 2019 at 2:30
  • I think the section Succeeding Lenin: 1924–1927 of the Wiki article on Stalin, and also Wiki's Rise of Joseph Stalin explain this. Also, see Purges of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union - Stalin's purges didn't start until 1929-30. Commented Apr 15, 2019 at 2:37

1 Answer 1

11

According to Trotsky (excrept from Коминтерн и ГПУ, published in Бюллетень оппозиции (большевиков-ленинцев) № 85, translation mine):

In 1928 […] not only the shooting squad, but even arrest would be inconceivable: the generation, alongside which I went thorugh the October Revolution and the civil war, was still alive. Politburo felt it was under siege from all sides. From Central Asia I had the ability to keep in constant contact with the growing opposition. In these conditions Stalin, after a year of doubt, decided to use exile as a lesser evil. His arguments were: isolated from USSR, with no staff or material resources, Trotsky will be unable to act […]. Stalin admitted on multiple occasions that my exile was his "greatest mistake".

He simply was too popular at the moment. Even his deportation to Almaty in January 1928 was handled in a very roundabout way - sure, he was forcibly removed from Moscow, but on the other hand - he was allowed to keep most of his posessions (most importantly - his vast personal archive), and until October he had full freedom in communication. On another hand, keeping him in Soviet Union was not an option, either: he kept on rallying his supporters. So he was exiled.

P.S. This isn't really related to the decision-making process regarding the exile, but: what I found interesting while researching this question was that even when Stalin consolidated his power he was mainly concerned by Trotsky's archive (in fact, the Stalin's "greatest mistake" remark Trotsky mentions was about allowing him to take the archive with him). The order for Trotsky's murder only came in 1939, when Trotsky in his article "Сверхборджиа в Кремле" publicly denounced Stalin for the pact with Germany (and also pretty much implied Stalin poisoned Lenin).

3
  • 1
    Not only Trotsky was too popular, but Stalin was not omnipotent yet in 1927.
    – Alex
    Commented Apr 15, 2019 at 11:42
  • Why was his personal archive so important?
    – Abdussamad
    Commented Apr 18, 2019 at 19:38
  • @Abdussamad Trotsky's archive has a lot of documents (for a very broad definition of "document" - from government decrees to personal notes) that went through his hands. In USSR some of these documents were made secret or even destroyed as they contradicted the official position of the Party on events and persons these documents were connected to. Commented Apr 19, 2019 at 3:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.