It should also be said in this context that the western idea of protectorates, as in the relationship between say, Rome and Numidia at the time of the second Punic war, is significantly different from the classical Chinese view of protectorates/tributaries. The latter was generally a semi-metaphysical recognition of the Chinese as a semi-heavenly kingdom, and did not particularly mean anything much politically, in a strict pragmatic sense. This is obvious from the fact that no Chinese soldiers are known to have fought any wars on behalf of the Kingdom of Cochin, for example. Also there were Chinese ambassadors in almost all the Mallu Kingdoms, since at least the 10th century, largely on the back of the importance of the spice trade route. This is not to say that all the relationships between China and such territories were vague and airy. The Chinese did go for cold realpolitik protectorate relationships with the Uighur against the Dzungars, for example. However IMHO, the political relationship between China and Cochin does not accurately translate to the English 'protectorate' though it may come closest to it, and should be understood more from the perspective of the history of Chinese political sentiments.