Skip to main content
1 of 2
Jay
  • 89
  • 2

What makes studying science different from studying the history of science?

Put differently, do science historians need to explain, say, the discovery of thermodynamics in a mathematically rigorous manner like a physicist would? Or can they omit the highly technical aspects of thermodynamics from their study and just focus on relevant records written in a language accessible to them?

(If possible, I hope you could help look relevant on-line resources.)

Jay
  • 89
  • 2