I know it's not much to go on, but can anyone identify the type of vessel in the photo?

Being officers, there is no cap tally for me to try and zoom in on. enter image description here

  • 5
    Given the sheer size of the gun, figure its gotta be a cruiser or bigger.
    – T.E.D.
    Commented Jan 31, 2021 at 16:32
  • 4
    The uniforms seem to point to the Royal Navy: The knotted cuff-insignia: uniform-reference.net/insignia/rn/rn_ww1_ranks_officer_1.html, and the four rows of buttons, and the caps match too.
    – b.Lorenz
    Commented Jan 31, 2021 at 17:37
  • 2
    Also, and in case my previous comment is wrong, a now deleted (by the author) answer pointed out that only the Germans used E in their designation schemes for turrets. It was pointed that the uniforms look like Royal Navy uniforms and I guess the author answer deleted the answer because of it, but we do know that the Royal Navy took hold of a few German ships after they were interned at Scapa Flow. That would match the festive appearance of the men (posing on top of a captured enemy ship).
    – SJuan76
    Commented Jan 31, 2021 at 19:29
  • 3
    I know we are not supposed to answer in comments, but I do not feel confident enough to write an answer. But following my previous comment, could it be the SMS Baden? It was a German battleship, but the British prevented it from being scuttled at Scapa Flow. They used it to research German battleships (and then it would make sense for them to paint the E, since they would be unfamiliar with the German naming schema). Lots of guesses, i know, but it feels the narrative nicely. I hope that it helps someone write a more solid answer.
    – SJuan76
    Commented Jan 31, 2021 at 19:39
  • 3
    One other detail - the man on front left has no curl, which strongly suggests this is WWI era. Until October 1918, "non-military" branches (surgeons, paymasters, etc) had no curl on the stripes; this was changed 1918 (1915 for engineers). Commented Jan 31, 2021 at 21:29

2 Answers 2


I agree completely that this looks like Royal Navy officers and a Royal Navy battleship. However, I'm going to add something to @kimchi-lover's excellent answer, and go a little further - I think there is a reasonable possibility we can identify the ship as well as the general type.

First off, dates. This is before the end of World War I; one of the officers, the lieutenant on the lower left, has no "curl" on his sleeve, and these became universal in late 1918. He is presumably an engineer, surgeon, or similar. In addition, one of the men is wearing some kind of decoration, but none of the others are. This suggests it was before the end of the war, when service ribbons would have been issued.

Secondly, the ship. @kimchi-lover suggested Dreadnought, which mounted 12" guns in similar turrets. I agree with their reasoning, but think this is a slightly earlier vessel. The four classes produced before Dreadnought had a similar but slightly different turret, seen here on Formidable.

enter image description here

Compared to Dreadnought (below) you can see that the older style turret had a wider "pedestal" and the sides were more steeply sloped back.

enter image description here

In this image of Russell, another pre-dreadnought with the older style turret, you can see the viewing port at the top of the turret and the turret "clamps" at the base.

enter image description here

The turret these men are sitting on seems to have quite a steep slope, and the same wide pedestal - note that there's space between the right-hand man and the turret edge. The pedestal edge slopes gently downwards, and they can sit comfortably on it, whereas it doesn't look like this would be as easy with the Dreadnought style turret where the pedestal is a bit narrower. (The clamps are also exactly the same as seen on Russell, though that might be quite a trivial detail.)

This suggests it was one of four classes: Formidable, London, Duncan, or King Edward VII. All of them had very similar turret designs. Given these very close similarities, I do not think it is likely to be a ship not built by a British yard. The same guns were also sold abroad for use on Italian and Japanese warships, and seem to have had broadly similar turrets, but it seems unlikely that a visiting RN party would be posed like this on one of them, singing(?) and wearing gloves, wellington boots, etc.

So, can we narrow it down any further? I think we can. The painted letter "E" is the clue; this book (p. 285) notes that in 1914-15, some of the King Edward VII class were painted with recognition letters on the turret sides. HMS King Edward VII was "KE".

This is unusual - it's the only case I've found of identification letters actually being painted on turrets, although it does sound like a reasonable approach in large squadrons of identical ships. Apparently the more common approach was to paint distinctive stripes on the funnels - perhaps this was an experiment?

Either way, the "E" here is in more or less exactly where you'd expect to see it if it were "KE". These turrets had a single long flat face towards the back (see below) and it would be the natural place to paint the letters. The "K" is presumably just out of shot.

enter image description here

Finally, the barrier immediately in front of the guns - a steel sheet with punched holes of varying sizes - is very similar to the one seen in this photo of King Edward VII. It's a very small image and the turret itself is concealed, but the resemblance is clear. The same site has a photo of the officers, but tragically not clear enough to make out any resemblances...

If this identification is correct, which is a bit of an if, it also narrows it down to a very limited period. The letters were only painted on in 1914-15, and King Edward VII hit a mine and sank in January 1916 (remarkably, only one man out of almost 800 died). So we have both an earliest and latest date.

  • 1
    Agree, that sloped turret was one of the first things that struck me. Looks like a tank turret, not a ww2 battleship main gun. Commented Feb 2, 2021 at 2:58
  • Is the letter E actually painted on the turret? It seems to me that it is on the canvas cover over the turret. That might open up the time window a bit.
    – Jon Custer
    Commented Feb 3, 2021 at 14:30

The short answer: a British capital ship (that is, battleship or battle cruiser) mounting 12" guns of the sort described here, that is, any "Dreadnought" built before 13.5" guns became popular, that is, built in the period 1906-12. Or possibly, as Andrew comments, some other pre-Dreadnought ship from earlier in the century, but using the same, or very similar turret design.

The features that make me sure have to do with the shape of the turret (illustrated here), in particular that it is not as wide as the turn-table it rotates on, and with the flat surfaces of its polyhedral shape. Andrew, in a comment, points out that the series of clamps at the base of the turret, visible in an illustration in the Wikipedia article about HMS Dreadnought, is very much like those seen in the OP's photograph. (I suppose the clamps are to hold a canvas cover or gasket in place, to use when the guns are not in use, and when one wants to keep water from sloshing into the turret.) The follow-on turrets, for 13.5" guns, seem to me to be too rounded, as seen here.

Another feature in common between the OP's turret and the Dreadnought turret is the presence of "sighting hoods", which look like frog's eyes protruding above the front of the turret. This might distinguish the OP's turret from other 12" turrets of the era.

The turrets of the near contemporary German ship SMS Kaiser, which bore guns of essentially the same calibre are distinctively different. The general shape (an oblong box or "gun house", sitting on a cylindrical pedestal or "barbette") is forced by the technological constraints. But the exact proportions are different. In the OP's photograph the barbette is wider than the gun house, but on the Kaiser's the gun house is almost exactly as wide as its barbette, as is the case with a later ship's turret, two decades later. In other cases the gun house is slightly wider than the pedestal.

As a speculation, I offer the guess that the feature of the "BVIII" turrets used by HMS Dreadnought that caught my eye, that the pedestal was wider than the gun house, was a transitional form, not followed by battleship turrets designed later.

  • After a bit more digging, I think you're right it's a 12" turret, but it might be an earlier ship - there were a number of classes which had similar turrets with Mk IX guns rather than Dreadnought's Mk X. You can see the turret for Formidable here, for example, and Russell here. The turrets for these ships seem to have a more pronounced slope, which fits with the shape of the turret behind them. Commented Jan 31, 2021 at 23:33
  • Interesting that this turret has a large "E" on the side of it
    – justCal
    Commented Jan 31, 2021 at 23:56
  • 1
    And one more follow-up - this book refers to "identification letters painted-up on the sides of 12-inch turrets" for four of the King Edward VII class in ~1914; King Edward VII used "KE". It's not clear if this was the only class that used such letters, but it's the only one mentioned in the book. So this looks quite promising! Commented Feb 1, 2021 at 0:03
  • 2
    Royal Navy sleeves had curls for officers.
    – justCal
    Commented Feb 1, 2021 at 0:30
  • 2
    @LаngLаngС The loops on the rank-rings of the cuffs are typical of RN uniforms, and not of Kriegsmarine ones, which looked more like US Navy ones (with a crown or star over the loop-less rings). The cap badge is like a "warning" traffic sign, as in the RN, not like the oval used by the KM. Commented Feb 1, 2021 at 0:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.