37

The photo below was found in an envelope among a bundle of family photos which were recently handed down on the English side of my family.

enter image description here

Aside from the photo itself, the only clues are as follows:

  • The word 'Prince' is written on the back of the photo in pencil. This could be misleading but, given the next point below, that seems unlikely.

  • All of the other photos in the envelope containing the picture above which have been identified so far are of European royals, with one exception: the 32nd Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, Abdül Aziz (identified here by sempaiscuba) . Among these are ones of Alfred, second son of Queen Victoria, and Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna of Russia.

  • Judging by the age of the people identified so far, most of the photos were probably originally taken between the late 1860s and the mid 1870s. If the 'Prince's' photo falls into this bracket, he would probably have been born in the mid 1850s or early 1860s.

  • The photos seem to have been collected either by my Great Grandmother (b. 1851) or my Great Great Grandmother (b. 1833).

I'd be grateful for any information or additional clues which might lead to an identification of the boy. A definite answer to the main question would be great, but I don't know if there is enough information here for that to be possible.

Improve this question
1
  • you're a relative of napoleon?
    – BCLC
    Commented Aug 17, 2021 at 16:49

3 Answers 3

Reset to default
56

I don't know uniforms well enough to be completely affirmative, but all your clues and the physionomy of the boy remind me of French Imperial Prince Napoleon, son of Napoleon III.

He was born in 1856 and the pictures on his wiki page show a strong ressemblance (in my humble opinion) with the boy on your photo. On this picture, he even wears a similar uniform. On this one, taken a few months before his death, he seems to wear the same decoration as on your photo. If I am correct, your photo would have been taken around 1868-70.

He would die in 1879 during the Anglo-Zulu War in South Africa.

Confirmation is provided by a comment from @Aaron Brick:
The page Napoleon Prince Imperial 1860s Paris France Royal French Cdv Photo By Levitsky has this photo on sale, dated and with more information as:

enter image description here 1860s CDV photo of Napoleon, Prince Imperial (1856 - 1879), who was the only child of Emperor Napoleon III of France and his Empress consort Eugenie de Montijo. After his father was dethroned in 1870, he relocated with his family to England. On his father's death in January 1873, he was proclaimed Napoleon IV, Emperor of the French by the Bonapartist faction. In England he trained as a soldier. Keen to see action, he successfully put pressure on the British to allow him to participate in the Anglo-Zulu War. In 1879, serving with British forces, he was killed in a skirmish with a group of Zulus. His early death sent shockwaves throughout Europe, as he was the last serious dynastic hope for the restoration of the Bonapartes to the throne of France (from Wikipedia). Photographer is Levitsky out of Paris, France.

Improve this answer
2
  • 15
    This is correct; there is another view of this photograph, with some metadata, at worthpoint.com/worthopedia/…
    – user18968
    Commented Aug 31, 2018 at 17:08
  • 3
    Thank you. The link provided by @AaronBrick leaves no doubt, but other pictures linked to are pretty conclusive too.
    – Lars Bosteen
    Commented Sep 1, 2018 at 1:47
3

To my eye this looks remarkably like Alexei Nikolaevich, son of Nicholas II and Alexandra - except it is alleged to be taken a generation earlier. This leads me to suspect that it is either Nicholas himself at a young age or his (look-alike) cousin George V. However quality photographs of both as youth are difficult to find on the web.

Improve this answer
2

It is of course difficult to identify this based solely on family resemblance. As we know the European aristocracy of that time was so highly interwoven that is was said that Queen Victoria was the grandmother of Europe.

But age of the photo, outlook of the face, the expression around the eyes make one candidate stick out in particular: this seems to be the most promising prince of all, Victoria's favourite grandson: Wilhelm II of House Hohenzollern, future emperor of Germany.

Just judging the face and the expression on it (click to enlarge):
enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

The face alone might be not entirely convincing, given the vast family network already mentioned. The giveaway might be the slightly crippled arm on display in the picture from the question, though.

enter image description here

A traumatic breech birth resulted in Erb's palsy, which left him with a withered left arm about six inches (15 centimetres) shorter than his right. He tried with some success to conceal this; many photographs show him holding a pair of white gloves in his left hand to make the arm seem longer. In others, he holds his left hand with his right, has his crippled arm on the hilt of a sword, or holds a cane to give the illusion of a useful limb posed at a dignified angle. Historians have suggested that this disability affected his emotional development. (WP Wilhelm II)

The uniform in the question might prove a distraction and is not a 100% reliable indicator. Especially Wilhelm had a lot of desire in him to dress up:
enter image description here

That thing with the arm and hands said, this answer is now obviously less good than Evargalo's.

Improve this answer
2
  • 3
    The obvious equal length of both arms for the photo in question definitively rules out Wilhelm. I should have mentioned that in my answer, as it's why I didn't include him in the possibilities.
    – Pieter Geerkens
    Commented Aug 31, 2018 at 18:06
  • 1
    @PieterGeerkens I was suspicious just because the left arm was so visible (and frequently avoided in photos of him). But to me it still looks as if the left arm in Q-pic is a bit shorter and the hand much smaller. They were quite apt at disguising arm length and strength by composition and perspective… Maybe here it's the other way around: equal arms and hands in reality and in this shot it tricks my mind.
    – LаngLаngС
    Commented Aug 31, 2018 at 18:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.